From others,
This phrase refers to the practice of collecting taxes from those who are not part of the ruling family or the citizens of a kingdom. In the context of Matthew 17, Jesus is discussing the temple tax, which was a religious levy imposed on Jewish males for the maintenance of the temple. The tax was traditionally collected from those outside the immediate family of the king, highlighting a distinction between insiders and outsiders. This reflects the broader biblical theme of separation between God's people and the world, as seen in passages like Exodus 19:5-6, where Israel is called a "kingdom of priests and a holy nation."

Peter answered.
Peter, one of Jesus' closest disciples, often acts as a spokesperson for the group. His response here indicates his understanding of the societal norms regarding taxation. Peter's role in the Gospels is significant, as he is often depicted as impulsive yet deeply committed to Jesus. His interactions with Jesus provide insight into the learning process of the disciples as they come to understand Jesus' teachings and mission. This moment is part of Peter's journey of faith, which culminates in his leadership role in the early church, as seen in the Book of Acts.

Then the sons are exempt,
Jesus uses this phrase to illustrate a spiritual truth. In a royal household, the children of the king are not subject to the same taxes as the subjects. By extension, Jesus implies that as the Son of God, He is exempt from the temple tax, and by association, His followers, as children of God, are also exempt. This statement foreshadows the new covenant, where believers are considered children of God (John 1:12, Romans 8:16-17). It also points to the freedom found in Christ, as Paul later expounds in Galatians 4:4-7, where believers are no longer slaves but sons and heirs through God.

Jesus said to him.
Jesus' response to Peter is both a teaching moment and a revelation of His identity. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus uses everyday situations to convey deeper spiritual truths. Here, He subtly affirms His divine sonship and the privileges that come with it. This interaction also highlights Jesus' wisdom in addressing complex issues with simplicity and clarity. His teachings often challenge societal norms and religious practices, inviting His followers to see beyond the literal and grasp the spiritual implications of His words.

1. Jesus
The central figure in this passage, Jesus is teaching Peter about the nature of His kingdom and the freedom of the children of God.

2. Peter
One of Jesus' closest disciples, Peter is engaged in a conversation with Jesus about the temple tax, which leads to a deeper teaching moment.

3. Temple Tax Collectors
These individuals approached Peter to inquire whether Jesus pays the temple tax, setting the stage for the teaching moment.

4. Capernaum
The location where this event takes place, a town where Jesus performed many miracles and teachings.

5. The Temple
While not directly mentioned in this verse, the temple is the context for the tax being discussed, representing the religious obligations of the Jewish people.Understanding Sonship
Jesus uses the analogy of sons being exempt to illustrate the believer's position in God's family. As children of God, we are not bound by the same obligations as those outside the family.

Freedom in Christ
This passage highlights the freedom believers have in Christ. While we respect earthly authorities, our ultimate allegiance is to God's kingdom.

Responsibility and Witness
Jesus instructs Peter to pay the tax to avoid causing offense, teaching us the importance of being responsible and maintaining a good witness in society.

Divine Provision
The subsequent miracle of the coin in the fish's mouth (Matthew 17:27) reminds us of God's provision and care for our needs, even in mundane matters.1. What is the meaning of Matthew 17:26?

2. How does Matthew 17:26 illustrate Jesus' understanding of earthly authority and freedom?

3. What does "the sons are exempt" reveal about our identity in Christ?

4. How can we apply Jesus' teaching on freedom to our daily lives?

5. Connect Matthew 17:26 with Romans 13:1-2 on submission to authorities.

6. How does this verse encourage us to prioritize spiritual obligations over earthly ones?

7. Why does Jesus exempt sons from paying the temple tax in Matthew 17:26?

8. How does Matthew 17:26 reflect Jesus' understanding of His divine sonship?

9. What historical context explains the temple tax mentioned in Matthew 17:26?

10. What are the top 10 Lessons from Matthew 17?

11. In Matthew 17:24-27, Jesus tells Peter to find a coin in a fish's mouth to pay the temple tax. Is there any evidence or logical explanation for this unusual claim?

12. How many times did the rooster crow before Peter denied Jesus? (Matthew 26:34 vs. Mark 14:30)

13. How did Simon Peter find out that Jesus was the Christ? By a revelation from heaven (Matthew 16:17) His brother Andrew told him (John 1:41)

14. 2 Peter 1:16-18 refers to the Transfiguration; why is its account noticeably different from the synoptic Gospels' versions?“From others,”

• The question Jesus posed just prior was, “From whom do the kings of the earth collect customs and taxes? From their own sons, or from others?” (Matthew 17:25). That civil picture mirrors the temple setting; royal families don’t tax their children.

• Peter recognizes that outsiders, not family members, bear the king’s levies—much as foreigners paid Solomon’s labor burden (1 Kings 9:21) while his royal household was spared.

• The temple tax itself came from Exodus 30:13-16, a half-shekel “atonement money” paid by Israel’s men. Yet Jesus’ question reframes it around kingly privilege, hinting that the temple’s true King is present (Malachi 3:1).

---

Peter answered

• Peter’s quick reply reveals common sense yet limited grasp; he states what everyone assumes without yet seeing its deeper implication.

• This moment recalls other times Peter spoke first and learned afterward (Luke 5:5; John 6:68). His honesty gives Jesus a teaching foothold.

• By agreeing that “others” pay, Peter unwittingly sets up Jesus to announce a stunning truth about His own status.

---

Then the sons are exempt

• Jesus draws the plain conclusion: “If outsiders pay, then sons don’t.” As God’s unique Son (Matthew 3:17; John 5:18), He is inherently free from a tax that supports His Father’s house.

• He extends the thought to all who belong to Him. Believers are “heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ” (Romans 8:17) and therefore share His freedom.

• This liberty is not license; verse 27 shows Jesus willingly paying “so that we will not offend them,” echoing Paul’s call to forego rights for others’ sake (1 Corinthians 9:12).

• Thus the episode teaches:

– Jesus’ divine sonship.

– Our adopted sonship (Galatians 4:4-7).

– The priority of love over asserting freedoms (1 Peter 2:16).

---

Jesus said to him

• The authority behind the declaration matters. “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Me” (Matthew 28:18), so when Jesus speaks, the matter is settled.

• His word not only interprets Scripture; it fulfills it—just as He earlier claimed the Sabbath was His domain (Matthew 12:8).

• Peter, who will later hear the Father say “listen to Him” on the mount (17:5), is again reminded that Christ’s voice interprets every obligation and tradition.

---

summary

Matthew 17:26 shows Jesus revealing His royal, divine sonship by claiming exemption from the temple tax while also hinting at the believer’s adopted freedom. Though He is not obligated, He will still pay to avoid needless offense, modeling humble love. The verse teaches who Jesus is, who we are in Him, and how true sons willingly lay aside rights for the sake of others.

(26) Of strangers.--The answer must be looked at from the Eastern rather than the European theory of taxation. To the Jews, as to other Eastern nations, direct taxation was hateful as a sign of subjugation. It had roused them to revolt under Rehoboam (1Kings 12:4), and they had stoned the officer who was over the tribute. They had groaned under it when imposed by the Syrian kings (1 Maccabees 10:29-30; 1 Maccabees 11:35). It was one of their grievances under Herod and his sons (Jos. Ant. xvii. 8, ? 4). Judas of Galilee and his followers had headed an insurrection against it as imposed by the Romans (Acts 5:37). It was still (as we see in Matthew 22:17) a moot point between the Pharisees and Herodians whether any Jew might lawfully pay it. Peter naturally answered our Lord's question at once from the popular Galilean view.

Then are the children free.--The words are commonly interpreted as simply reminding Peter of his confession, and pressing home its logical consequence that He, the Christ, as the Son of God. was not liable to the "tribute" which was the acknowledgment of His Father's sovereignty. This was doubtless prominent in the answer, but its range is, it is believed, wider. (1.) If this is the only meaning, then the Israelites who paid the rate are spoken of as "aliens," or "foreigners," in direct opposition to the uniform language of Scripture as to their filial relation to Jehovah. (2.) The plural used not only in this verse but in that which follows, the "lest we should offend them," the payment for Peter as well as for Himself, all indicate that we are dealing with a general truth of wide application. Some light is thrown upon the matter by a fact of contemporary history. The very point which our Lord decides had been debated between the Pharisees and Sadducees. The Temple-rate question was to them what the Church-rate question has been in modern politics. After a struggle of seven days in the Sanhedrin, the Pharisees carried their point, made it (what it had not been before) a compulsory payment, and kept an annual festival in commemoration of their victory. Our Lord, placing the question on its true ground, pronounces judgment against the Pharisees on this as on other points. They were placing the Israelite on the level of a "stranger," not of a "son." The true law for "the children of the kingdom" was that which St. Paul afterwards proclaimed: "not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver" (2Corinthians 9:7). . . .

Verse 26. - Of strangers. Peter is brought to the desired point. He answers, as any one would, that in earthly kingdoms the children of the ruling monarch are exempt from taxes, which are exacted from all other subjects. Then are the children free. The comparison required the use of the plural, though the reference is properly confined to himself. The deduction leads naturally to the lesson of Christ's immunity, he virtually implies (though the inference is not developed in words), "I am the Son of God, as you, Peter, have acknowledged; this tax is levied for the house and service of God, whose Son I am; therefore I am free from the obligation of paying it; it cannot be required that I should pay tribute to my Father." Looked at in its original nature, the impost could not with propriety be demanded from him. It was an offering of atonement, a ransom of souls. How could he give money in expiation of himself - he who had come to give his life a ransom for others? Why should he ransom himself from sin and death, who had come to take away sin and destroy death and open everlasting life to all men? There was need to make the point clear now that Christ had openly asserted his Messiahship and his Divine nature. To pay the demamt without explanation, after the statement of his Divinity, might occasion serious misapprehension in the minds of his followers. So he gently but convincingly shows that his claim of Sonship exempted him from all liability of the impost.

Parallel Commentaries ...


“From
Ἀπὸ (Apo)
Preposition
Strong's 575: From, away from. A primary particle; 'off, ' i.e. Away, in various senses.

others,”
ἀλλοτρίων (allotriōn)
Adjective - Genitive Masculine Plural
Strong's 245: From allos; another's, i.e. Not one's own; by extension foreign, not akin, hostile.

[Peter] answered.
Εἰπόντος (Eipontos)
Verb - Aorist Participle Active - Genitive Masculine Singular
Strong's 2036: Answer, bid, bring word, command. A primary verb; to speak or say.

“Then
Ἄρα¦Γε (Ara¦Ge)
Particle
Strong's 686: Then, therefore, since. Probably from airo; a particle denoting an inference more or less decisive.

the
οἱ (hoi)
Article - Nominative Masculine Plural
Strong's 3588: The, the definite article. Including the feminine he, and the neuter to in all their inflections; the definite article; the.

sons
υἱοί (huioi)
Noun - Nominative Masculine Plural
Strong's 5207: A son, descendent. Apparently a primary word; a 'son', used very widely of immediate, remote or figuratively, kinship.

are
εἰσιν (eisin)
Verb - Present Indicative Active - 3rd Person Plural
Strong's 1510: I am, exist. The first person singular present indicative; a prolonged form of a primary and defective verb; I exist.

exempt,”
ἐλεύθεροί (eleutheroi)
Adjective - Nominative Masculine Plural
Strong's 1658: Free, delivered from obligation. Probably from the alternate of erchomai; unrestrained, i.e. not a slave, or exempt.

Jesus
Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous)
Noun - Nominative Masculine Singular
Strong's 2424: Of Hebrew origin; Jesus, the name of our Lord and two other Israelites.

declared.
ἔφη (ephē)
Verb - Imperfect Indicative Active - 3rd Person Singular
Strong's 5346: To say, declare. Properly, the same as the base of phos and phaino; to show or make known one's thoughts, i.e. Speak or say.


Matthew 17:26 NIV
Matthew 17:26 NLT
Matthew 17:26 ESV
Matthew 17:26 NASB
Matthew 17:26 KJV

Matthew 17:26 BibleApps.com
Matthew 17:26 Biblia Paralela
Matthew 17:26 Chinese Bible
Matthew 17:26 French Bible
Matthew 17:26 Catholic Bible

NT Gospels: Matthew 17:26 Peter said to him From strangers (Matt. Mat Mt)