Now in those days, when there was no king in Israel
This phrase sets the historical context for the narrative, indicating a time of political and social instability. The absence of a king suggests a period of decentralized leadership, where the tribes of Israel were governed by judges. This era is characterized by the repeated cycle of Israel's disobedience, oppression by enemies, cries for deliverance, and God raising a judge to save them. The lack of centralized authority often led to moral and social chaos, as seen in the events of Judges 19-21. This phrase also foreshadows the eventual demand for a monarchy in Israel, as seen in 1 Samuel 8.

a Levite who lived in the remote hill country of Ephraim
The Levites were a tribe set apart for religious duties, serving in the Tabernacle and later the Temple. This Levite's residence in the hill country of Ephraim, rather than in a Levitical city, may indicate a departure from his expected role. Ephraim was a significant tribe in Israel, often associated with leadership and influence. The geographical setting in the hill country suggests isolation, which may contribute to the Levite's actions and the unfolding narrative. The Levite's presence in Ephraim connects to other biblical stories, such as the division of the kingdom under Jeroboam, an Ephraimite.

took for himself a concubine from Bethlehem in Judah
A concubine was a secondary wife, often of lower status, who did not have the same rights as a primary wife. This practice, while culturally accepted in ancient times, often led to familial strife and complications, as seen in the stories of Abraham, Jacob, and David. Bethlehem in Judah is significant as the future birthplace of King David and Jesus Christ, highlighting the town's importance in biblical history. The mention of Bethlehem may also serve to contrast the moral decay in Israel with the future hope of a righteous king. The Levite's choice to take a concubine from Bethlehem may reflect the inter-tribal relationships and social dynamics of the time.

But she was unfaithful to him
This phrase indicates a breach of marital fidelity, which is a recurring theme in the Bible, often symbolizing Israel's unfaithfulness to God. The Hebrew term used here can imply sexual immorality or simply leaving the relationship. This reflects the moral decline during the time of the Judges, a period marked by the repeated cycle of sin, oppression, repentance, and deliverance.

and left him to return to her father’s house
The act of returning to her father's house suggests a breakdown in the marital relationship. In ancient Israelite culture, a woman's return to her father's house could indicate a separation or divorce. This action also highlights the patriarchal structure of society, where a woman's identity and security were tied to her male relatives.

in Bethlehem in Judah
Bethlehem, known as the "House of Bread," is significant in biblical history. It is the birthplace of King David and later Jesus Christ, linking this narrative to the broader messianic lineage. The mention of Judah situates the story within the tribal territories of Israel, emphasizing the geographical and tribal divisions present during the time of the Judges.

After she had been there four months
The specific mention of four months suggests a significant period of separation, allowing time for reflection and potential reconciliation. This duration also sets the stage for the subsequent actions of the Levite, her husband, and underscores the tension and unresolved issues within their relationship. The passage of time often serves as a narrative device in Scripture to indicate a period of testing or waiting.

her husband got up and went after her
This phrase indicates the Levite's initiative to reconcile with his concubine, reflecting the cultural norms of marriage and reconciliation in ancient Israel. The Levite's action can be seen as a pursuit of restoration, aligning with biblical themes of seeking reconciliation (Matthew 5:23-24).

to speak kindly to her
The intention to speak kindly suggests a desire for peace and restoration. This reflects the biblical principle of using gentle words to heal relationships (Proverbs 15:1). It also highlights the importance of communication in resolving conflicts.

and bring her back
The Levite's goal was to restore the relationship and bring his concubine back home. This act of bringing back can be seen as a type of redemption, similar to how God seeks to bring back His people to Himself (Hosea 2:14-20).

taking his servant and a pair of donkeys
The mention of a servant and donkeys indicates preparation for a journey, suggesting the Levite's commitment to the reconciliation process. The use of donkeys for travel was common in ancient times, reflecting the practical aspects of life in that era.

So the girl brought him into her father’s house
The concubine's action of bringing the Levite into her father's house shows a willingness to reconcile. This setting in the father's house is significant, as it was a place of protection and familial authority, often seen in biblical narratives (Genesis 24:28).

and when her father saw him, he gladly welcomed him
The father's glad welcome indicates a positive reception and a desire for peace. Hospitality was a crucial cultural value in ancient Israel, and the father's response aligns with the biblical emphasis on welcoming others (Hebrews 13:2). This act of welcoming can also be seen as a reflection of God's open arms to those who return to Him.

His father-in-law, the girl’s father
In ancient Israelite culture, family relationships were central to social structure. The father-in-law's role was significant, often involving negotiations and hospitality. This reflects the patriarchal society where the father had authority over family matters. The mention of "the girl's father" emphasizes the familial bond and the importance of marriage alliances in maintaining social and economic stability.

persuaded him to stay
Hospitality was a crucial aspect of ancient Near Eastern culture. The act of persuasion indicates the father-in-law's desire to extend hospitality, which was a sign of respect and goodwill. This reflects the cultural norm of treating guests with honor and ensuring their comfort, as seen in other biblical narratives like Abraham's hospitality to the three visitors in Genesis 18.

so he remained with him three days
The number three often signifies completeness or divine perfection in the Bible. Staying three days could symbolize a complete period of rest and fellowship. This duration allowed for the strengthening of family ties and the fulfillment of social obligations. It also mirrors other biblical events where three days are significant, such as Jonah in the belly of the fish or Jesus in the tomb.

eating, drinking, and lodging there
These activities highlight the customs of hospitality and fellowship. Sharing meals was a way to build and affirm relationships. Eating and drinking together were acts of peace and friendship, often seen in covenant-making contexts. Lodging indicates the provision of shelter and safety, which were essential aspects of hospitality in a time when travel could be dangerous. This phrase underscores the importance of community and the provision of basic needs within a familial setting.

On the fourth day
The mention of the "fourth day" indicates a period of hospitality that was common in ancient Near Eastern culture. Hospitality was a significant cultural value, and extended stays were not unusual. This timeframe also reflects the patience and persistence of the Levite, who had come to reconcile with his concubine.

they got up early in the morning
Rising early was typical for travelers in ancient times to avoid the heat of the day. This practice is seen throughout Scripture, such as in Genesis 19:27 when Abraham rose early to see the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. It signifies diligence and a readiness to undertake a journey.

and prepared to depart
The preparation to leave suggests a resolution to the initial conflict that brought the Levite to Bethlehem. It also indicates a transition in the narrative, moving from reconciliation to the impending journey, which will lead to significant events in Gibeah.

but the girl’s father said to his son-in-law
The father-in-law's role here is crucial, as he represents the familial and social customs of the time. His interaction with the Levite shows a desire to maintain peace and goodwill, reflecting the importance of family ties and reconciliation.

“Refresh your heart with a morsel of bread
This phrase is an invitation to extend hospitality further. "Refresh your heart" is a Hebrew idiom meaning to be strengthened or encouraged. Bread, a staple food, symbolizes sustenance and fellowship. This echoes the hospitality shown by Abraham in Genesis 18:5 when he offered bread to the divine visitors.

and then you can go.”
The father-in-law's suggestion to delay departure emphasizes the cultural importance of hospitality and rest before a journey. It also foreshadows the events that will unfold due to the delay, highlighting the narrative tension and the unfolding of God's providential plan.

So they sat down and the two of them ate and drank together.
In ancient Near Eastern culture, sharing a meal was a significant act of hospitality and fellowship. It symbolized peace and mutual respect between parties. This setting in Judges 19 reflects the customs of the time, where hospitality was a sacred duty, especially towards travelers. The act of eating and drinking together often signified the establishment or renewal of a covenant or agreement, as seen in Genesis 26:30, where Isaac makes a covenant with Abimelech. This phrase also highlights the importance of community and relationship, which are central themes throughout the Bible.

Then the girl’s father said to the man,
The girl's father, acting as the host, plays a crucial role in the narrative. In the patriarchal society of ancient Israel, the father was the head of the household and responsible for the well-being of his family and guests. His involvement in the conversation underscores the cultural norms of the time, where family heads negotiated and made decisions. This interaction can be compared to other biblical instances where fathers or patriarchs engage in negotiations or discussions, such as Laban with Jacob in Genesis 31.

“Please agree to stay overnight and let your heart be merry.”
The father's invitation to stay overnight and enjoy oneself reflects the cultural emphasis on hospitality. In the ancient world, travel was arduous and dangerous, making the offer of shelter and sustenance a vital aspect of hospitality. The phrase "let your heart be merry" suggests a desire for the guest to find joy and relaxation, a common theme in biblical hospitality, as seen in the story of Abraham entertaining angels in Genesis 18. This invitation also foreshadows the events to come, as the narrative in Judges 19 takes a dark turn, highlighting the contrast between the initial hospitality and the subsequent violence. The call to merriment can be seen as a temporary reprieve from the harsh realities of life, a theme echoed in Ecclesiastes 8:15, where enjoying life is encouraged amidst life's uncertainties.

The man got up to depart
This phrase indicates the Levite's intention to leave his father-in-law's house. In the broader context of Judges 19, the Levite had been staying with his concubine's father for several days. The Levite's decision to depart reflects the cultural practice of hospitality, where guests were often encouraged to stay longer. This moment also highlights the transient nature of life during the period of the Judges, where travel was common due to the decentralized tribal society.

but his father-in-law persuaded him
The father-in-law's persuasion is a reflection of the Near Eastern custom of hospitality, which was highly valued. This act of persuasion can be seen as a form of social obligation, where the host seeks to honor the guest by extending their stay. It also underscores the father-in-law's desire to maintain familial bonds and perhaps ensure the well-being of his daughter, the Levite's concubine. This interaction can be compared to other biblical instances of hospitality, such as Abraham's reception of the three visitors in Genesis 18.

so he stayed there that night
The Levite's decision to stay another night demonstrates the effectiveness of the father-in-law's persuasion and the cultural weight of hospitality. This delay sets the stage for the subsequent events in Gibeah, which are pivotal in the narrative of Judges 19. The phrase also serves as a reminder of the importance of timing and divine providence in biblical narratives, where seemingly small decisions can lead to significant outcomes. The concept of staying or delaying is seen in other biblical stories, such as Lot's hesitation to leave Sodom in Genesis 19, which also had profound consequences.

On the fifth day
The mention of the "fifth day" indicates a prolonged stay, suggesting the cultural importance of hospitality in ancient Near Eastern societies. Hospitality was a significant social duty, often involving extended visits. This extended stay also reflects the father's desire to ensure the well-being and safety of his daughter and her husband.

he got up early in the morning to depart
Rising early to travel was common in ancient times to avoid the heat of the day. This phrase indicates the Levite's intention to leave promptly, possibly due to a sense of urgency or responsibility. Early departure is also seen in other biblical narratives, such as Abraham's early rising in Genesis 22:3, indicating a readiness to fulfill one's duty.

but the girl’s father said, “Please refresh your heart.”
The father’s request to "refresh your heart" is an invitation to rest and eat, reflecting the cultural emphasis on hospitality and care for guests. This phrase underscores the father's persistent hospitality, which can be seen as both genuine concern and a possible reluctance to let his daughter leave. The heart in biblical terms often refers to the center of one's being, including emotions and will, suggesting a holistic refreshment.

So they waited until late afternoon
The delay until "late afternoon" shows the father's success in persuading the Levite to stay longer. This waiting period may symbolize the tension between duty and hospitality. The late afternoon departure would have been risky due to the dangers of traveling at night, highlighting the narrative's underlying tension and foreshadowing the subsequent events.

and the two of them ate
The act of eating together signifies fellowship and agreement. In biblical culture, sharing a meal was a sign of peace and relationship. This meal could be seen as a final act of hospitality before the Levite's departure, emphasizing the father's care and the social customs of the time. Eating together is a recurring theme in Scripture, often symbolizing unity and covenant, as seen in the Last Supper (Matthew 26:26-28).

When the man got up to depart with his concubine and his servant
This phrase introduces the main characters involved in the narrative. The man is a Levite, a member of the tribe set apart for religious duties in Israel. The presence of a concubine highlights the cultural practices of the time, where concubinage was a socially accepted arrangement, though not God's ideal for marriage. The servant's inclusion indicates the man's social status and the practicalities of travel in ancient Israel.

his father-in-law, the girl’s father, said to him
The father-in-law's role is significant in the cultural context of hospitality and family honor. In ancient Near Eastern societies, the father-in-law had a vested interest in the well-being of his daughter and her household. This interaction reflects the familial bonds and obligations that were central to the social fabric of the time.

“Look, the day is drawing to a close. Please spend the night.
The father-in-law's insistence on staying reflects the cultural importance of hospitality. In biblical times, travel was fraught with danger, and night travel was particularly risky. Offering shelter was a way to ensure safety and demonstrate generosity, a virtue highly esteemed in the ancient world.

See, the day is almost over. Spend the night here, that your heart may be merry.
This repetition emphasizes the urgency and sincerity of the father-in-law's request. The phrase "that your heart may be merry" suggests a desire for the Levite to enjoy rest and fellowship, which aligns with the biblical theme of hospitality as a means of fostering community and joy.

Then you can get up early tomorrow for your journey home.”
The suggestion to leave early the next day indicates a practical concern for the Levite's safety and well-being. Traveling in daylight was safer and more efficient. This reflects the wisdom literature's emphasis on planning and prudence, as seen in Proverbs, where careful preparation is often commended.

But the man was unwilling to spend the night.
This phrase highlights the Levite's determination to continue his journey despite the late hour. In the context of ancient Israel, traveling at night was dangerous due to the threat of bandits and wild animals. His unwillingness to stay may reflect a sense of urgency or distrust of the local hospitality, which is a recurring theme in the narrative of Judges, where the moral and social fabric of Israel is depicted as deteriorating.

He got up and departed,
The Levite's decision to leave immediately suggests a proactive approach to his journey. This action can be seen as a reflection of the chaotic period of the Judges, where individuals often acted independently without centralized leadership. The phrase also indicates a transition in the narrative, moving the story forward and setting the stage for the events that follow.

and arrived opposite Jebus (that is, Jerusalem),
Jebus, known later as Jerusalem, was at this time a Canaanite city not yet conquered by the Israelites. This geographical reference is significant as it underscores the incomplete conquest of the Promised Land, a recurring issue in the Book of Judges. Jerusalem would later become the political and spiritual center of Israel under King David, highlighting the city's future importance in biblical history.

with his two saddled donkeys and his concubine.
The mention of two saddled donkeys indicates preparation for a long journey, suggesting the Levite's intent to travel efficiently and with necessary provisions. The presence of his concubine is central to the narrative, as her subsequent mistreatment and death become a catalyst for the events that lead to civil strife within Israel. The concubine's role also reflects the complex social and familial structures of the time, where concubinage was a common practice, though it often led to familial discord and moral complications.

When they were near Jebus
Jebus is the ancient name for Jerusalem, a city that would later become central to Israel's history. At this time, it was inhabited by the Jebusites, a Canaanite tribe. The Israelites had not yet fully conquered the land, as seen in Joshua 15:63, where the Jebusites continued to dwell in Jerusalem. This highlights the incomplete obedience of Israel in driving out the inhabitants of the land as commanded by God.

and the day was almost gone
Traveling in ancient times was fraught with danger, especially as night approached. The lack of artificial lighting and the presence of bandits made it perilous to continue traveling after dark. This urgency underscores the need for a safe place to rest, reflecting the harsh realities of travel in the ancient Near East.

the servant said to his master
The servant's role here is significant, as servants often provided counsel and assistance to their masters. This interaction shows a level of respect and consideration between the servant and his master, which is consistent with the biblical principle of treating others with dignity, as seen in Colossians 4:1.

“Please, let us stop at this Jebusite city
The suggestion to stop at a Jebusite city indicates a pragmatic approach to travel, prioritizing safety over cultural or religious differences. The Jebusites were not Israelites, and stopping in their city could pose risks, yet the servant's concern for immediate safety takes precedence. This reflects the tension between practical needs and spiritual convictions, a theme seen throughout Scripture.

and spend the night here.”
Spending the night in a foreign city would require trust in God's protection, as seen in Psalm 4:8, which speaks of dwelling in safety through God's provision. This decision also foreshadows the events that follow, highlighting the moral and spiritual decline in Israel during the time of the Judges, where "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25).

But his master replied
This phrase introduces the Levite, who is the central figure in this narrative. The term "master" indicates his authority over his servant, reflecting the social hierarchy of ancient Israel. The Levite's role is significant as he represents the religious leadership of the time, which is often depicted as flawed in the Book of Judges.

We will not turn aside to the city of foreigners
The Levite's decision not to enter a city of foreigners highlights the tension between Israelites and non-Israelites. This reflects the Israelites' concern for maintaining cultural and religious purity, as interactions with foreigners often led to idolatry and moral corruption, a recurring theme in Judges.

where there are no Israelites
This phrase underscores the Levite's desire to remain within the community of God's chosen people. It reflects the importance of tribal and national identity in ancient Israel. The absence of Israelites in a city would imply a lack of shared values and covenantal faithfulness, which the Levite seeks to avoid.

We will go on to Gibeah
Gibeah, a city in the territory of Benjamin, is chosen as a destination because it is an Israelite city. This decision is ironic, as Gibeah becomes the setting for a grievous sin against the Levite's concubine, leading to civil war. The choice of Gibeah foreshadows the moral decay within Israel itself, despite the Levite's attempt to avoid foreign influence. This narrative echoes the broader theme of Judges, where Israel's internal corruption is as dangerous as external threats.

He continued,
This phrase indicates ongoing dialogue, suggesting a narrative progression. The speaker is the Levite, who is traveling with his concubine and servant. This continuation implies a decision-making process, highlighting the urgency and necessity of finding shelter before nightfall.

“Come,
The invitation "Come" is a call to action, emphasizing the need for unity and cooperation among the travelers. It reflects the Levite's leadership role and his responsibility for the safety of his companions.

let us try to reach
The phrase "let us try to reach" suggests a sense of urgency and determination. It indicates the travelers are aware of the dangers of traveling at night, especially in a time when lawlessness was prevalent in Israel, as described in the broader context of the Book of Judges.

one of these towns
The reference to "one of these towns" indicates the proximity of multiple settlements, offering potential refuge. This reflects the tribal allotments in the land of Israel, where towns were often close to one another, providing options for travelers.

to spend the night
Spending the night in a town was a common practice for travelers seeking safety and hospitality. In ancient Near Eastern culture, hospitality was a significant social obligation, and townspeople were expected to offer shelter to strangers.

in Gibeah
Gibeah was a town in the territory of Benjamin. It later becomes infamous for the events that unfold in this chapter, leading to a civil war in Israel. Gibeah's mention here foreshadows the tragic events that will occur, highlighting the moral decline in Israel during this period.

or Ramah.”
Ramah was another town in the territory of Benjamin, located near Gibeah. It was a significant location in Israel's history, later becoming the home of the prophet Samuel. The choice between Gibeah and Ramah underscores the Levite's desire to find a safe haven, unaware of the impending danger in Gibeah.

So they continued on their journey
This phrase indicates the Levite, his concubine, and his servant were traveling from Bethlehem in Judah to the remote hill country of Ephraim. The journey reflects the period of the Judges, characterized by a lack of centralized leadership in Israel, as "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25). The Levite's journey underscores the tribal and fragmented nature of Israelite society at the time.

and the sun set
The setting sun signifies the approach of night, a time often associated with danger and uncertainty in biblical narratives. In ancient times, travel after dark was perilous due to the lack of lighting and the threat of bandits. This detail foreshadows the impending events in Gibeah, highlighting the vulnerability of travelers and the moral darkness prevalent in Israel during the Judges period.

as they neared Gibeah in Benjamin
Gibeah, a town in the territory of Benjamin, becomes the setting for the tragic events that follow. The town's name means "hill," and it is historically significant as the birthplace of King Saul (1 Samuel 10:26). The narrative in Judges 19 serves as a precursor to the civil strife between the tribes of Israel and Benjamin, leading to the near destruction of the Benjamites (Judges 20-21). The events in Gibeah echo the depravity found in Sodom (Genesis 19), drawing a parallel between the moral decay in both stories. This connection emphasizes the need for righteous leadership and foreshadows the eventual establishment of the monarchy in Israel.

They stopped to go in and lodge in Gibeah.
Gibeah was a city in the territory of Benjamin, located north of Jerusalem. It is significant in biblical history as the hometown of King Saul (1 Samuel 10:26). The decision to lodge in Gibeah rather than a foreign city like Jebus (Jerusalem) reflects the expectation of hospitality among fellow Israelites. This expectation is rooted in the cultural and religious norms of ancient Israel, where hospitality was a sacred duty (Genesis 18:1-8). The failure of Gibeah's inhabitants to offer hospitality foreshadows the moral decay and lawlessness depicted in the subsequent narrative.

The Levite went in and sat down in the city square,
The Levite's presence in the city square indicates a common practice in ancient times where travelers would wait in public spaces to be offered lodging by local residents. This practice is seen in other biblical accounts, such as in Genesis 19:1-3 with Lot in Sodom. The Levite's role as a religious figure adds a layer of expectation for hospitality, as Levites were set apart for religious duties and often relied on the generosity of others (Deuteronomy 12:19).

but no one would take them into his home for the night.
The refusal of the townspeople to offer hospitality is a stark violation of cultural norms and highlights the moral decline in Israel during the time of the Judges, a period characterized by the repeated phrase, "In those days Israel had no king; everyone did as they saw fit" (Judges 21:25). This lack of hospitality contrasts sharply with the expected behavior of Israelites and serves as a prelude to the tragic events that follow. The narrative echoes the inhospitable actions of Sodom, drawing a parallel between Gibeah and the infamous city destroyed for its wickedness (Genesis 19). This incident underscores the need for righteous leadership and foreshadows the eventual establishment of monarchy in Israel.

That evening
The timing of events in biblical narratives often holds significance. Evening in ancient Israel was a time of transition, marking the end of the day's labor and the beginning of rest. It was also a time when travelers sought shelter, as night travel was dangerous. This sets the stage for the unfolding events, emphasizing the urgency and vulnerability of the situation.

an old man from the hill country of Ephraim
The hill country of Ephraim was a central region in Israel, known for its rugged terrain and significant biblical history. Ephraim was one of the tribes of Israel, descended from Joseph's son. The mention of the old man being from Ephraim highlights the tribal connections and tensions present in the narrative. It also suggests a sense of hospitality and kinship, as the old man might feel a connection to the Levite, who was also from Ephraim.

who was residing in Gibeah
Gibeah was a city in the territory of Benjamin, notorious for the events that unfold in this chapter. The old man's residence in Gibeah, despite being from Ephraim, indicates a possible displacement or migration, common in the period of the Judges when tribal boundaries were fluid. This detail foreshadows the conflict between the tribes of Israel and Benjamin that arises later.

(the men of that place were Benjamites)
The parenthetical note emphasizes the tribal identity of Gibeah's inhabitants. The Benjamites were one of the twelve tribes of Israel, known for their warrior skills. This detail is crucial for understanding the ensuing conflict, as the actions of the men of Gibeah lead to a civil war between the tribe of Benjamin and the other tribes of Israel.

came in from his work in the field
The old man's return from the field suggests a life of labor and simplicity, typical of agrarian societies in ancient Israel. Fields were essential for sustenance, and working them was a daily necessity. This detail underscores the normalcy and routine of life, contrasting sharply with the horrific events that follow. It also highlights the old man's industriousness and perhaps his isolation, as he is not part of the city's social fabric, which may explain his willingness to offer hospitality to the travelers.

When he looked up and saw the traveler in the city square
This phrase introduces the old man, a character who plays a crucial role in the narrative. The city square was a common gathering place in ancient cities, often used for social interaction and commerce. It was customary for travelers to wait there for someone to offer them hospitality, as inns were rare. This setting highlights the cultural expectation of hospitality in ancient Israel, a theme that is central to this story. The traveler, a Levite, represents a figure who should have been readily welcomed, reflecting the moral decline in Israel during the time of the Judges.

the old man asked
The old man is depicted as a resident of Gibeah, a city within the territory of Benjamin. His inquiry reflects the cultural norm of offering hospitality to strangers, a practice deeply rooted in the traditions of the Near East. The old man's willingness to engage with the traveler contrasts with the indifference of the other inhabitants of Gibeah, underscoring the breakdown of social and moral order in Israel. This encounter foreshadows the tragic events that follow, highlighting the theme of hospitality—or the lack thereof—as a measure of righteousness.

“Where are you going, and where have you come from?”
These questions are typical of ancient Near Eastern hospitality customs, serving both as a polite inquiry and a means to assess the needs of the traveler. The questions also serve to introduce the Levite's journey, which is a critical element of the narrative. The Levite's response reveals his background and the purpose of his journey, setting the stage for the unfolding events. This interaction can be seen as a reflection of the broader spiritual journey of Israel, as the nation grapples with its identity and relationship with God during the time of the Judges. The questions also echo the biblical theme of pilgrimage and sojourning, reminding readers of the transient nature of life and the ultimate journey towards God's promises.

The Levite replied
The Levite's role in Israel was to serve in religious duties, assisting the priests and maintaining the tabernacle. This context highlights the spiritual decline in Israel during the time of the Judges, as Levites were often found outside their designated roles. The Levite's presence in this narrative underscores the chaotic and lawless period described in Judges, where "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25).

We are traveling from Bethlehem in Judah
Bethlehem, meaning "house of bread," is significant in biblical history as the birthplace of King David and later Jesus Christ. This journey from Bethlehem indicates a movement from a place of provision and future messianic significance. The mention of Judah, the tribe from which David and Jesus would come, foreshadows the importance of this region in God's redemptive plan.

to the remote hill country of Ephraim
Ephraim was one of the prominent tribes of Israel, often representing the northern kingdom. The "remote hill country" suggests isolation and perhaps a lack of spiritual oversight, contributing to the moral and social decay evident in the narrative. This setting contrasts with the centrality of worship and community life intended for Israel.

where I am from
The Levite's origin in Ephraim connects him to a region known for its significant role in Israel's history, including the location of Shiloh, where the tabernacle was situated. This background emphasizes the Levite's deviation from his expected religious duties and the broader theme of Israel's spiritual waywardness.

I went to Bethlehem in Judah
This repetition of Bethlehem underscores its importance and the Levite's personal journey, which mirrors Israel's spiritual journey. The Levite's movement between these locations reflects the broader narrative of seeking provision and spiritual fulfillment, yet encountering moral and societal failure.

and now I am going to the house of the LORD
The "house of the LORD" refers to the tabernacle, the central place of worship for Israel. This phrase highlights the Levite's intended return to his religious duties, yet the narrative reveals the disconnect between intention and reality in Israel's spiritual life. It also foreshadows the eventual establishment of the temple in Jerusalem, a central theme in Israel's history.

but no one has taken me into his home
This statement reflects the lack of hospitality and community responsibility, which were vital aspects of Israelite culture. The absence of hospitality indicates the breakdown of societal norms and covenantal obligations, further illustrating the moral decline during the period of the Judges. This lack of welcome contrasts with the biblical ideal of welcoming strangers, as seen in Abraham's hospitality (Genesis 18) and the New Testament exhortation to show hospitality (Hebrews 13:2).

even though there is both straw and feed for our donkeys
In the ancient Near East, hospitality was a crucial cultural value. Travelers often relied on the generosity of others for lodging and sustenance. The mention of straw and feed indicates preparation for the journey, showing responsibility and self-sufficiency. Straw was used as bedding and feed for the donkeys, essential for travel. This reflects the agrarian lifestyle of the Israelites and their dependence on animals for transportation and labor.

and bread and wine for me
Bread and wine were staples in the diet of ancient Israelites, symbolizing sustenance and fellowship. Bread, often unleavened, was a daily necessity, while wine was a common beverage, sometimes used for purification and celebration. This phrase highlights the provision for basic needs, echoing themes of God's provision seen throughout Scripture, such as in the manna provided in the wilderness (Exodus 16).

and the maidservant and young man with me
The presence of a maidservant and a young man indicates a small traveling party, suggesting the Levite's social status and need for assistance. Servants were common in households, and their inclusion underscores the communal aspect of travel and survival. This reflects the social structures of the time, where households often included extended family and servants.

There is nothing that we, your servants, lack.”
This statement emphasizes the Levite's preparedness and humility. By referring to themselves as "your servants," they acknowledge the social customs of deference and respect towards potential hosts. The assertion of lacking nothing suggests a readiness to be self-sufficient, yet it also serves as an invitation for hospitality, a test of the host's generosity. This mirrors the biblical theme of God providing for His people, as seen in Psalm 23:1, "The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want."

“Peace to you,” said the old man.
The greeting "Peace to you" reflects the Hebrew word "Shalom," which conveys a sense of wholeness, safety, and well-being. This greeting is significant in the context of ancient Israel, where hospitality was a deeply ingrained cultural value. The old man's offer of peace indicates his intention to provide protection and care, contrasting with the potential danger of the public square. This phrase echoes the biblical theme of peace as a divine blessing, seen in passages like Numbers 6:24-26, where the Lord's peace is a sign of His favor.

“Let me supply everything you need.”
The old man's offer to supply everything needed highlights the cultural importance of hospitality in the ancient Near East. In a time when inns were rare and often unsafe, travelers relied on the kindness of strangers. This act of generosity is reminiscent of Abraham's hospitality to the three visitors in Genesis 18, where he provides for their needs. The old man's willingness to care for the traveler and his companions reflects the biblical principle of loving one's neighbor, as seen in Leviticus 19:34.

Only do not spend the night in the square.”
The warning against spending the night in the square underscores the potential danger and moral decay present in Gibeah, a town of the tribe of Benjamin. This cautionary advice foreshadows the tragic events that follow in the narrative, highlighting the lawlessness and lack of hospitality in Israel during the time of the Judges. The square, typically a place of gathering and commerce, becomes a symbol of vulnerability and threat. This situation parallels the story of Lot in Genesis 19, where he urges the angelic visitors not to stay in the city square of Sodom, indicating a similar environment of moral corruption.

So he brought him to his house
This phrase highlights the cultural importance of hospitality in ancient Israel. Hospitality was a sacred duty, especially in a time when inns were rare and travel was perilous. The host's willingness to bring a stranger into his home reflects the values seen in other biblical narratives, such as Abraham's hospitality to the three visitors in Genesis 18. This act of kindness is a stark contrast to the inhospitable and dangerous environment of Gibeah, where the Levite initially found no one willing to take him in.

and fed his donkeys.
Providing for the donkeys indicates a comprehensive hospitality that extends beyond the human guests to their animals. In the agrarian society of ancient Israel, animals were valuable assets, essential for travel and work. This care for the donkeys underscores the host's generosity and thoroughness in ensuring the well-being of his guests. It also reflects the biblical principle of stewardship over creation, as seen in Proverbs 12:10, which states, "A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal."

And they washed their feet
Foot washing was a common practice in the ancient Near East due to the dusty roads and the use of sandals. It was a gesture of welcome and comfort, often performed by servants. This act symbolizes cleansing and refreshment, preparing the guests for rest and fellowship. In the New Testament, Jesus washing the disciples' feet in John 13 serves as a profound example of humility and service, echoing the hospitality shown here.

and ate and drank.
Sharing a meal signifies fellowship and peace. In biblical times, eating together was a sign of acceptance and community. This meal contrasts with the violence and immorality that later unfolds in the narrative, highlighting the initial peace and safety within the host's home. The act of eating and drinking together is a recurring theme in Scripture, symbolizing covenant relationships, as seen in the Last Supper (Matthew 26:26-29), where Jesus establishes the New Covenant with His disciples.

While they were enjoying themselves
This phrase indicates a moment of hospitality and fellowship, a common cultural practice in ancient Israel. Hospitality was a sacred duty, and sharing a meal was a sign of peace and friendship. The setting is reminiscent of Genesis 19, where Lot entertains angels in Sodom, highlighting the contrast between the host's intentions and the impending wickedness.

suddenly the wicked men of the city surrounded the house
The suddenness underscores the unexpected nature of evil, often catching people off guard. The "wicked men" are described similarly to the men of Sodom, suggesting a pervasive moral decay in Israel during the time of the Judges, a period marked by the repeated cycle of sin, oppression, repentance, and deliverance. This reflects the theme of Israel's need for a righteous king, as noted in Judges 21:25.

Pounding on the door
This aggressive action signifies the urgency and violence of the men's intentions. Doors in biblical times were often simple wooden structures, easily breached, symbolizing the vulnerability of the household. The act of pounding also echoes the persistent nature of sin, as seen in Genesis 4:7, where sin is described as crouching at the door.

they said to the old man who owned the house
The old man represents the head of the household, responsible for the protection and well-being of his guests. His role is crucial in the narrative, as he is expected to uphold the cultural and moral duty of hospitality. This mirrors the responsibility of leaders in Israel to protect and guide their people, a theme prevalent throughout the Old Testament.

“Bring out the man who came to your house
This demand is a direct violation of the sacred duty of hospitality, which required the host to protect his guests at all costs. The request echoes the depravity of Sodom in Genesis 19:5, illustrating the moral decline in Israel. It serves as a warning of the consequences of turning away from God's laws.

so we can have relations with him!”
The phrase reveals the intent of sexual violence, a grievous sin in the eyes of God. This act of intended homosexual rape is condemned in Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:26-27, highlighting the severity of the sin. The narrative foreshadows the need for a savior, as the moral corruption of humanity necessitates divine intervention, ultimately fulfilled in Jesus Christ, who offers redemption and restoration.

The owner of the house went out and said to them
In the context of ancient Israel, hospitality was a sacred duty, and the owner of the house felt a strong obligation to protect his guest. This reflects the cultural norms of the time, where the host was responsible for the safety and well-being of those under his roof. The owner’s intervention highlights the seriousness of the situation and his attempt to prevent a grave sin.

No, my brothers, do not do this wicked thing!
The term "brothers" indicates a plea to fellow Israelites, emphasizing a shared identity and moral code. The owner’s use of "wicked thing" underscores the gravity of the intended actions, which were contrary to the laws and ethics given to Israel. This echoes the moral decline seen in the period of the Judges, where "everyone did what was right in his own eyes" (Judges 21:25).

After all, this man is a guest in my house.
The concept of a guest was highly esteemed in ancient Near Eastern culture. The host's duty to protect a guest was paramount, often taking precedence over other social norms. This reflects the biblical principle of hospitality seen throughout Scripture, such as in Genesis 18 with Abraham and the visitors.

Do not commit this outrage.
The word "outrage" indicates a severe violation of social and divine law. This plea is reminiscent of the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19, where similar language is used to describe the grievous sin of the inhabitants. The parallel serves as a warning of the consequences of such actions and the moral decay that can occur when God's laws are ignored.

Look, let me bring out my virgin daughter and the man’s concubine
This phrase reflects the cultural and historical context of ancient Israel, where hospitality was a sacred duty, often taking precedence over personal safety. The host's offer to protect his guest at the expense of his own family members highlights the extreme measures taken to uphold this cultural norm. The mention of a "virgin daughter" and a "concubine" underscores the patriarchal society where women had limited rights and were often seen as property. This situation parallels the account in Genesis 19, where Lot offers his daughters to protect his guests, illustrating a recurring theme of the depravity and moral decline in Israel during the time of the Judges.

and you can use them and do with them as you wish
This phrase reveals the depth of moral corruption and the devaluation of human life during this period. The willingness to sacrifice women to appease the demands of a violent mob reflects the societal breakdown and lack of justice prevalent in Israel at the time. This narrative serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of Israel's disobedience to God's laws, as outlined in Deuteronomy, where the protection of the vulnerable is emphasized. The phrase also foreshadows the eventual call for a king in Israel, as the repeated refrain in Judges, "In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes," highlights the need for righteous leadership.

But do not do such a vile thing to this man.
The host's plea to spare his guest underscores the gravity of the intended crime, which is described as "vile." This term indicates an act that is morally reprehensible and against God's commandments. The protection of the guest over the women reflects the distorted values of the time, where male honor and hospitality were prioritized over the dignity and safety of women. This plea can be seen as a desperate attempt to prevent a greater sin, echoing the biblical principle of protecting the innocent, as seen in the laws given to Israel in Exodus and Leviticus. The narrative ultimately points to the need for redemption and the coming of a just and righteous Savior, Jesus Christ, who upholds the dignity of all individuals and offers true protection and salvation.

But the men would not listen to him.
This phrase highlights the moral depravity and lawlessness during the time of the Judges, a period characterized by the repeated refrain, "In those days Israel had no king; everyone did as they saw fit" (Judges 21:25). The refusal to listen reflects a hardened heart and a rejection of hospitality norms, which were highly valued in ancient Near Eastern culture. This echoes the similar account in Genesis 19, where the men of Sodom refused to heed Lot's plea, illustrating a parallel in the depth of societal corruption.

So the Levite took his concubine and sent her outside to them,
The Levite's actions reveal a disturbing lack of protection and care for his concubine, highlighting the low status of women and concubines in ancient Israelite society. This act of sending her out is reminiscent of the offering of Lot's daughters in Genesis 19, further emphasizing the moral decay. The Levite, a member of the priestly tribe, should have been a spiritual leader, yet his actions betray a failure to uphold God's standards of justice and mercy.

and they raped her and abused her throughout the night,
This tragic event underscores the extreme violence and inhumanity present in Gibeah, a city of the tribe of Benjamin. The phrase "throughout the night" indicates prolonged suffering, reflecting the depth of human depravity. This incident serves as a grim reminder of the consequences of Israel's disobedience to God and the absence of righteous leadership. It foreshadows the eventual judgment and near destruction of the tribe of Benjamin in the subsequent chapters.

and at dawn they let her go.
The release of the concubine at dawn signifies the end of her torment but also highlights the callousness of her abusers, who only cease their violence with the coming of daylight. Dawn often symbolizes new beginnings or hope in Scripture, yet here it starkly contrasts with the horror of the preceding night. This moment serves as a prelude to the Levite's response and the ensuing civil war, illustrating the far-reaching consequences of sin and the need for repentance and restoration.

Early that morning
This phrase indicates the time of day, suggesting a new beginning or a transition. In biblical narratives, mornings often symbolize hope or a fresh start, yet here it contrasts with the tragic events that have unfolded. The timing underscores the urgency and desperation of the woman's situation.

the woman went back to the house
The woman, a concubine, is central to this narrative. Her return to the house signifies her attempt to seek refuge or safety, highlighting her vulnerability. In the cultural context of ancient Israel, a concubine held a lower status than a wife, which may have contributed to her mistreatment and the events leading to this moment.

where her master was staying
The term "master" reflects the patriarchal structure of ancient Israelite society, where women were often under the authority of male figures. This relationship dynamic is crucial to understanding the power imbalance and the lack of protection she experienced. The Levite, her master, represents a failure of leadership and protection, themes prevalent in the Book of Judges.

collapsed at the doorway
Her collapse at the doorway is symbolic of her exhaustion and the culmination of her suffering. Doorways in biblical literature can represent transitions or thresholds between safety and danger. Her position at the threshold underscores her tragic plight and the failure of the household to provide sanctuary.

and lay there until it was light
The phrase "until it was light" suggests a period of waiting and suffering through the night, a common biblical motif representing trials or tribulations. The arrival of light often symbolizes revelation or judgment. In this context, it foreshadows the grim discovery and the subsequent actions that lead to the Levite's call for justice, albeit through shocking means. This moment also serves as a prelude to the broader narrative of moral decay and the need for righteous leadership in Israel, themes that resonate throughout the Book of Judges.

In the morning
This phrase indicates the time of day, suggesting a new beginning or revelation. In biblical narratives, morning often symbolizes a time of decision or action (e.g., Genesis 19:27, Exodus 14:24). It sets the stage for the events that follow, highlighting the contrast between the darkness of the previous night and the light of day.

when her master got up
The term "master" reflects the patriarchal society of ancient Israel, where men held authority over women, including concubines. This relationship is complex, as concubines were considered part of the household but had fewer rights than wives. The Levite's actions throughout the chapter reveal a lack of compassion and responsibility, which is a recurring theme in Judges, illustrating the moral decline of Israel during this period.

and opened the doors of the house
Opening the doors signifies a transition from the private to the public sphere. In biblical times, the act of opening doors could symbolize readiness to face the world or to reveal what is hidden. This action foreshadows the discovery of the tragic events that occurred during the night.

to go out on his journey
The Levite's intention to continue his journey underscores his disregard for the gravity of the situation. It reflects the self-centeredness and moral apathy prevalent in the narrative. This journey motif is common in Scripture, often representing a physical and spiritual path (e.g., Abraham's journey in Genesis 12).

there was his concubine
The presence of the concubine at this moment is a stark reminder of the previous night's violence and the Levite's failure to protect her. Her status as a concubine, rather than a wife, highlights her vulnerability and the societal norms that devalued her life. This tragic event serves as a critique of the social and moral decay in Israel.

collapsed in the doorway of the house
The doorway is a significant location, symbolizing a threshold between safety and danger, life and death. Her collapse here emphasizes the failure of the household to provide protection and the broader failure of Israel to uphold justice and righteousness.

with her hands on the threshold
This detail poignantly captures her desperate attempt to reach safety, evoking a sense of tragedy and helplessness. The threshold, a place of transition, becomes a symbol of her unfulfilled hope for rescue. This imagery can be seen as a metaphor for Israel's spiritual state, caught between covenant faithfulness and moral collapse.

“Get up,” he told her.
This phrase reflects the Levite's command to his concubine after a night of horrific abuse. The Levite's words are stark and lack compassion, highlighting the moral decay present in Israel during the time of the Judges. This period was marked by a cycle of sin, oppression, repentance, and deliverance, as described throughout the Book of Judges. The Levite's command can be seen as indicative of the societal breakdown and the lack of respect for human dignity, especially towards women, which was prevalent in that era.

“Let us go.”
The Levite's insistence on leaving quickly suggests a desire to escape the scene of the crime and avoid further confrontation or shame. This reflects the broader theme in Judges of individuals acting in their own interest rather than seeking justice or righteousness. The phrase also underscores the transient and unstable nature of life during the time of the Judges, where there was no king in Israel, and everyone did what was right in their own eyes (Judges 21:25).

But there was no response.
This tragic statement indicates the concubine's death or near-death state, a result of the brutal events she endured. Her silence is a powerful testament to the consequences of unchecked sin and the failure of the community to protect the vulnerable. It also serves as a narrative device to highlight the Levite's callousness and the gravity of the situation, as he does not immediately recognize or respond to her condition.

So the man put her on his donkey
The act of placing her on the donkey signifies the Levite's practical response to the situation, yet it also underscores his detachment and lack of emotional engagement. In biblical times, a donkey was a common means of transport, symbolizing the burdens people carried. This image can be seen as a metaphor for the spiritual and moral burdens borne by Israel due to their disobedience and idolatry.

and set out for home.
The Levite's return home with his concubine's body marks the beginning of a series of events that lead to civil war within Israel (Judges 20). This journey back home is not just a physical return but also a narrative turning point that exposes the deep-seated issues within the nation. The Levite's actions, and the subsequent response of the tribes of Israel, illustrate the need for righteous leadership and foreshadow the eventual establishment of monarchy in Israel, which would bring a semblance of order and justice.

When he reached his house
This phrase indicates the Levite's return to his own dwelling after the horrific events in Gibeah. The Levite's homecoming marks a transition from the public sphere of Gibeah to the private sphere of his own household, highlighting the personal nature of the subsequent actions. The home, in ancient Israelite culture, was a place of refuge and safety, which contrasts sharply with the violence that follows.

he picked up a knife
The knife is a tool often associated with sacrifice and covenant in the Old Testament. In Genesis 22, Abraham uses a knife in the near-sacrifice of Isaac, symbolizing obedience and covenant with God. Here, the knife becomes a tool of judgment and a call to action for the tribes of Israel, rather than a symbol of divine covenant.

took hold of his concubine
The concubine, a secondary wife, reflects the complex social and familial structures of ancient Israel. Her status was lower than that of a primary wife, which may have contributed to her vulnerability and the subsequent tragedy. This act of taking hold signifies the Levite's control and authority over her, yet it also underscores the tragic objectification and dehumanization she suffers.

cut her limb by limb into twelve pieces
This gruesome act is reminiscent of sacrificial rituals, yet it is a perversion of such practices. The number twelve is significant, representing the twelve tribes of Israel. This dismemberment serves as a symbolic act, calling each tribe to witness the atrocity and to respond. It echoes the division of the covenant people and foreshadows the internal strife and division that will plague Israel.

and sent her throughout the territory of Israel
The distribution of the concubine's body parts serves as a call to national unity and action against the crime committed in Gibeah. It is a shocking summons to the tribes, demanding justice and highlighting the moral decay within Israel. This act parallels the later call to unity seen in the prophetic books, where Israel is urged to return to covenant faithfulness. The sending out of the pieces can also be seen as a type of prophetic action, akin to the symbolic acts of prophets like Ezekiel, designed to provoke a response from the people.

And everyone who saw it said,
This phrase indicates a communal reaction, emphasizing the collective shock and horror of the Israelites. The event described in Judges 19, involving the brutal abuse and death of a concubine, was so appalling that it elicited a unanimous response from the people. This reflects the deep moral and social decay present in Israel during the time of the Judges, a period characterized by the repeated cycle of sin, oppression, repentance, and deliverance.

“Nothing like this has been seen or done
The phrase underscores the unprecedented nature of the crime. It highlights the severity of the moral decline in Israel, where such an atrocity was unimaginable. This serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of Israel's failure to fully obey God's commands and drive out the Canaanite influences, which led to the adoption of pagan practices and a departure from God's law.

from the day the Israelites came out of the land of Egypt
This reference to the Exodus serves as a historical marker, reminding the Israelites of their covenant relationship with God, which began with their deliverance from Egypt. It contrasts the current state of moral decay with the time when God established them as His chosen people, intended to be a holy nation. The mention of Egypt also serves as a reminder of God's past faithfulness and the standards He set for His people.

until this day.
This phrase emphasizes the ongoing nature of the moral decline, suggesting that the situation had deteriorated progressively since the time of the Exodus. It serves as a call to reflection on how far the nation had strayed from its original calling and covenant with God.

Think it over,
This is an invitation to contemplation and self-examination. The Israelites are urged to consider the gravity of the situation and the underlying causes of such moral decay. It is a call to introspection, encouraging the people to reflect on their personal and collective responsibility in allowing such evil to occur.

take counsel,
This phrase suggests the need for collective deliberation and decision-making. It implies that the situation requires a thoughtful and unified response from the community. In the context of Israel, this would involve seeking God's guidance and wisdom, as well as consulting the leaders and elders to determine the appropriate course of action.

and speak up!”
The call to speak up is an exhortation to action. It emphasizes the necessity of addressing the issue openly and decisively. In the biblical context, this would involve confronting sin, seeking justice, and restoring righteousness within the community. It is a reminder of the responsibility of God's people to uphold His standards and to be a voice for truth and justice.