2 Samuel 4
Berean Study Bible

The Murder of Ish-bosheth

When Ish-bosheth son of Saul
Ish-bosheth, whose name means "man of shame," was the son of King Saul. His original name was Eshbaal, meaning "man of Baal," but it was likely changed to avoid association with the Canaanite god Baal. As Saul's son, Ish-bosheth was a legitimate heir to the throne, yet his reign was marked by weakness and dependency on Abner, Saul's military commander. This highlights the theme of divine sovereignty in leadership, as God had chosen David, not Ish-bosheth, to be king.

heard that Abner had died in Hebron
Abner was a powerful military leader and the primary supporter of Ish-bosheth's claim to the throne. His death in Hebron, a city of refuge and a significant location in David's rise to power, marked a turning point in the struggle for the throne of Israel. The Hebrew root for "heard" (שָׁמַע, shama) implies not just the act of hearing but also understanding and internalizing the implications of the news. Abner's death left Ish-bosheth vulnerable and exposed the fragility of his kingship.

his courage failed
The phrase "his courage failed" reflects a profound loss of strength and resolve. The Hebrew word used here, רָפָה (raphah), can mean to sink, relax, or become weak. Ish-bosheth's reliance on Abner rather than on God or his own leadership abilities is evident. This moment underscores the biblical principle that true courage and strength come from faith in God, not in human alliances or power.

and all Israel was dismayed
The dismay of Israel signifies a collective fear and uncertainty about the future. The Hebrew word for "dismayed" (נִבְהָל, nibhal) suggests being disturbed or terrified. This reaction reflects the instability and division within the nation during this period. The people of Israel were caught in a power struggle, longing for a leader who would unite them under God's covenant. This sets the stage for David's eventual consolidation of the kingdom, fulfilling God's promise to establish his throne.

Saul’s son
This phrase refers to Ish-bosheth, the son of King Saul, who was made king over Israel after Saul's death. The Hebrew root for "son" is "ben," which signifies not only a biological relationship but also a continuation of a legacy or dynasty. In the historical context, Ish-bosheth's reign represents the fragile continuation of Saul's line, highlighting the political instability in Israel during this period.

two men
The mention of "two men" introduces Baanah and Rechab, who play a crucial role in the unfolding narrative. The number two often symbolizes witness or testimony in biblical literature, suggesting that their actions will bear significant consequences. Historically, these men were likely seen as opportunists in a time of political upheaval.

leaders of raiding bands
The Hebrew term for "leaders" is "sar," which can mean prince, chief, or captain, indicating a position of authority. "Raiding bands" suggests a group engaged in guerrilla warfare or plundering, common in the tribal conflicts of ancient Israel. This phrase underscores the lawlessness and fragmented power structures following Saul's death.

One was named Baanah and the other Rechab
Names in the Bible often carry deep significance. "Baanah" means "in affliction" or "in response," while "Rechab" means "rider" or "chariot." These names may reflect their roles or characteristics. The narrative will reveal their actions as pivotal, illustrating themes of betrayal and ambition.

sons of Rimmon the Beerothite
"Rimmon" is a name that may be associated with a deity or mean "pomegranate," a symbol of fertility and abundance. "Beerothite" indicates their origin from Beeroth, a city of the Gibeonites. This detail situates them within the tribal and geographical landscape of Israel, emphasizing their outsider status within the Benjamite tribe.

from the tribe of Benjamin
The tribe of Benjamin was one of the twelve tribes of Israel, known for its warriors and strategic location. Saul, Israel's first king, was also from Benjamin, adding layers of political and familial complexity to the narrative. This connection highlights the internal strife within the tribe and the broader nation.

Beeroth is considered part of Benjamin
This parenthetical note clarifies the geographical and tribal affiliations, which are crucial for understanding the political dynamics at play. Beeroth's inclusion in Benjamin's territory underscores the fluidity and contested nature of tribal boundaries in ancient Israel, reflecting the ongoing struggle for power and identity.

because the Beerothites
The Beerothites were inhabitants of Beeroth, one of the cities of the Gibeonites. The Gibeonites were a group of Hivites who, through cunning, made a treaty with Joshua (Joshua 9). The name "Beeroth" means "wells" in Hebrew, indicating a place of water sources, which were vital in the arid regions of ancient Israel. The Beerothites' connection to the Gibeonites suggests a history of survival and adaptation, as they were initially spared from destruction due to their treaty with Israel. This highlights God's providence and the importance of covenants in biblical history.

fled to Gittaim
Gittaim is mentioned here as a place of refuge. The name "Gittaim" means "two winepresses" in Hebrew, suggesting a place of agricultural abundance. The act of fleeing indicates a time of distress or danger, likely due to the political upheaval following King Saul's death. This movement reflects the broader theme of displacement and seeking refuge, which is prevalent throughout the Bible. It serves as a reminder of God's provision and protection for those who are displaced or in exile.

and have lived there
This phrase indicates a settled existence, suggesting that the Beerothites found a measure of stability and community in Gittaim. The Hebrew verb used here for "lived" often implies dwelling or abiding, which can also carry spiritual connotations of abiding in God's presence. This reflects the biblical theme of finding peace and security under God's sovereignty, even in foreign lands.

as foreigners
The term "foreigners" in Hebrew is "gerim," which refers to sojourners or resident aliens. This status often meant living without the full rights of native-born citizens, yet the Law of Moses commanded Israel to treat foreigners with justice and compassion (Exodus 22:21). This highlights the biblical principle of hospitality and the recognition of shared humanity, reminding believers of their own status as "foreigners and exiles" in the world (1 Peter 2:11).

to this day
This phrase underscores the enduring nature of the Beerothites' situation. It suggests a long-term settlement and adaptation to their new circumstances. In the biblical narrative, such phrases often serve to connect past events with the present, emphasizing the continuity of God's faithfulness through generations. It invites readers to reflect on the lasting impact of historical events and God's unchanging nature amidst human change and uncertainty.

Now Saul’s son Jonathan
This phrase introduces us to Jonathan, the beloved friend of David and son of King Saul. Jonathan's loyalty to David, despite his father Saul's animosity, is a testament to his noble character. The Hebrew root for Jonathan, "Yehonatan," means "Yahweh has given," reflecting the divine favor and covenantal friendship he shared with David. Jonathan's legacy is significant in the narrative of David's rise to kingship, as it underscores themes of loyalty, friendship, and divine providence.

had a son whose feet were crippled
The mention of Jonathan's son being crippled is both literal and symbolic. In the ancient Near Eastern context, physical disabilities often carried social stigma and were seen as a disadvantage. The Hebrew word for "crippled" here is "piseah," which indicates lameness or being unable to walk properly. This detail foreshadows the challenges Mephibosheth will face and sets the stage for David's later acts of kindness, highlighting themes of grace and mercy.

He was five years old
The age of Mephibosheth at the time of the incident is significant. At five years old, he was still a child, vulnerable and dependent on others for care. This detail emphasizes the suddenness and tragedy of the events that led to his disability. It also serves to evoke compassion from the reader, as we consider the innocence and helplessness of a child caught in the turmoil of political upheaval.

when the report about Saul and Jonathan came from Jezreel
The "report" refers to the news of the deaths of Saul and Jonathan in battle, which came from Jezreel, a significant location in Israel's history. Jezreel was a site of many battles and symbolized the shifting tides of power. The Hebrew root for "report" is "shema," meaning to hear or listen, indicating the impact of this devastating news. This moment marks a turning point in Israel's monarchy and sets the stage for David's eventual rise to power.

His nurse picked him up and fled
The nurse's actions reflect the urgency and fear that gripped the household upon hearing the news. In the ancient world, the death of a king often led to political instability and danger for the royal family. The Hebrew word for "fled" is "barach," meaning to escape or run away, highlighting the desperate attempt to protect the young prince from potential harm.

but in her haste to flee, he fell and became lame
This phrase captures the tragic accident that resulted in Mephibosheth's lifelong disability. The nurse's haste, driven by fear, inadvertently led to the child's fall. The Hebrew word for "fell" is "naphal," which can also mean to be cast down or to fail. This incident is a poignant reminder of the fragility of life and the unforeseen consequences of our actions.

His name was Mephibosheth
The name Mephibosheth means "dispeller of shame" or "from the mouth of shame" in Hebrew. This name is prophetic, as Mephibosheth's account is one of redemption and restoration. Despite his physical limitations and the loss of his royal status, he later finds favor with King David, who honors his covenant with Jonathan by showing kindness to Mephibosheth. This act of grace reflects the biblical theme of God's mercy and the restoration of dignity to those who are marginalized or forgotten.

Now the sons of Rimmon the Beerothite
This phrase introduces us to Rechab and Baanah, who are identified as the sons of Rimmon from Beeroth. Beeroth was one of the cities of the Gibeonites, who had made a treaty with Israel during the time of Joshua (Joshua 9). The mention of their lineage and city highlights the complex interrelations between the Israelites and the surrounding peoples. Historically, the Gibeonites were integrated into Israel, yet they retained distinct identities. This background sets the stage for understanding the political and social dynamics at play.

Rechab and Baanah
These two brothers are central figures in this narrative. Their names are significant: "Rechab" means "rider" or "chariot," suggesting strength or mobility, while "Baanah" means "in affliction" or "in response," which could imply a reactionary nature. Their actions in the subsequent verses reveal their opportunistic and violent tendencies, which are pivotal in the unfolding drama of David's rise to power.

set out and arrived
This phrase indicates deliberate action and intent. The Hebrew root for "set out" (יָצָא, yatsa) often implies a purposeful departure, while "arrived" (בּוֹא, bo) suggests reaching a destination with intent. The brothers' journey is not casual; it is a mission with a specific goal, reflecting the calculated nature of their plan.

at the heat of the day
This detail provides a vivid picture of the setting. The "heat of the day" refers to the time when the sun is at its peak, typically around noon. In the ancient Near East, this was a time when people sought rest and shade, making it an opportune moment for the brothers to approach unnoticed. This timing underscores the cunning and premeditated nature of their actions.

at the house of Ish-bosheth
Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul, was the king of Israel at this time, ruling over the northern tribes. His house represents the seat of his power and authority. The brothers' approach to his house signifies a direct challenge to his rule and foreshadows the impending betrayal. Historically, Ish-bosheth's reign was marked by instability, and this setting highlights the vulnerability of his position.

who was taking his midday nap
This phrase paints a picture of vulnerability and unawareness. In the ancient world, a midday nap was common due to the intense heat, but it also left one exposed. Ish-bosheth's rest symbolizes a false sense of security and the fragility of human power. Spiritually, it serves as a reminder of the need for vigilance and the dangers of complacency, especially in leadership.

They entered the house
This phrase sets the scene for a clandestine and treacherous act. The Hebrew root for "entered" is "בּוֹא" (bo), which often implies coming or going with intent. In the context of ancient Israel, homes were considered sanctuaries of safety and hospitality. The act of entering with malicious intent was a grave violation of trust and social norms, highlighting the deceitful nature of Rechab and Baanah's actions.

under the pretense of getting wheat
The phrase "under the pretense" indicates deception. The Hebrew word for "pretense" is "תַּחַת" (tachat), meaning "under" or "instead of," suggesting a cover or disguise for their true intentions. Wheat was a staple in the ancient Near Eastern diet, symbolizing sustenance and life. By using the guise of acquiring wheat, Rechab and Baanah exploited a common, everyday activity to mask their sinister plot, reflecting the depths of their betrayal.

and they stabbed him in the stomach
The act of stabbing, particularly in the stomach, was a brutal and personal form of murder. The Hebrew verb "נָקַע" (naqah) means to pierce or strike, emphasizing the violence of the act. In biblical times, the stomach was often seen as the seat of emotions and life, making this act not only physically destructive but symbolically an attack on the very essence of the individual. This highlights the ruthlessness of Rechab and Baanah.

Then Rechab and his brother Baanah
The mention of both brothers by name underscores their joint culpability in the crime. In Hebrew culture, names often carried significant meaning and identity. "Rechab" means "rider" or "chariot," and "Baanah" means "in affliction" or "in response." Their names, coupled with their actions, suggest a narrative of individuals who perhaps saw themselves as agents of change or deliverance, albeit through misguided and violent means.

slipped away
The phrase "slipped away" conveys stealth and cowardice. The Hebrew root "מָלַט" (malat) means to escape or deliver oneself, often used in contexts of fleeing from danger or responsibility. This action reflects their awareness of guilt and fear of retribution. In the broader biblical narrative, such actions are often met with divine justice, reminding readers of the moral order upheld by God.

They had entered the house
This phrase indicates a premeditated action. The Hebrew root for "entered" (בּוֹא, bo) often implies a deliberate or purposeful movement. In the context of ancient Israel, entering a house uninvited, especially with malicious intent, was a grave violation of hospitality norms. This act sets the stage for the treachery that follows, highlighting the moral decay and political intrigue during the time of King David's rise to power.

while Ish-bosheth was lying on his bed
Ish-bosheth, the son of Saul, was the king of Israel at this time, albeit a weak and ineffective one. The image of him lying on his bed suggests vulnerability and perhaps a state of complacency or false security. In the Hebrew culture, the bed was a place of rest and safety, making this intrusion all the more heinous. It underscores the betrayal and cowardice of his murderers, who attacked him in his most defenseless state.

in his bedroom
The bedroom, or "inner chamber," was considered a private and secure place. The Hebrew term used here (חֶדֶר, cheder) often denotes an inner room, emphasizing the violation of personal space and trust. This act of violence in such a private setting reflects the deep treachery and the breakdown of societal and familial bonds during this turbulent period in Israel's history.

After they struck and killed him
The phrase "struck and killed" conveys the brutality and finality of the act. The Hebrew verb for "struck" (נָכָה, nakah) is often used in the context of a decisive blow, indicating the murderers' intent to ensure Ish-bosheth's death. This act of murder was not just a political assassination but a direct challenge to the anointed leadership of Israel, further destabilizing the nation.

they beheaded him
Beheading was a common practice in ancient warfare and served as a symbol of complete victory over one's enemies. In this context, it was a gruesome act meant to demonstrate power and instill fear. The removal of the head, the seat of identity and authority, signifies the utter humiliation and defeat of Ish-bosheth, as well as the ruthless ambition of his killers.

took his head
The act of taking the head was not only a trophy of conquest but also a message to others. In the ancient Near East, displaying the head of a defeated enemy was a way to assert dominance and claim legitimacy. This act was intended to curry favor with David, though it ultimately backfired, as David did not condone such treachery.

and traveled all night
Traveling by night suggests urgency and a desire to avoid detection. The Hebrew culture often associated night with danger and evil deeds, as it provided cover for unlawful activities. This nocturnal journey underscores the clandestine and desperate nature of their mission, as they sought to deliver the head to David before dawn.

by way of the Arabah
The Arabah refers to the desert region stretching from the Dead Sea to the Gulf of Aqaba. This route was likely chosen for its directness and the cover it provided. The harsh and desolate landscape of the Arabah serves as a fitting backdrop for the treacherous act, symbolizing the moral and spiritual barrenness of the murderers' hearts. This journey through the wilderness also contrasts with the righteous path that David, a man after God's own heart, was called to walk.

They brought the head of Ish-bosheth
This phrase highlights a brutal and violent act, reflecting the turbulent and often ruthless nature of ancient Near Eastern politics. The act of bringing a severed head was a common practice in ancient times to prove the death of an enemy. In Hebrew, the word for "head" is "rosh," which can also symbolize leadership or authority. The act of presenting Ish-bosheth's head to David was intended to demonstrate the finality of his claim to Saul's throne and to curry favor with David.

to David at Hebron
Hebron is significant as it was David's capital before he moved to Jerusalem. It is a city with deep patriarchal roots, being the burial place of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The mention of Hebron underscores David's legitimate and divinely sanctioned kingship, as he was anointed king over Judah there. The historical context of Hebron as a city of refuge and a Levitical city adds layers of meaning to David's rule being established there.

and said to the king
This phrase acknowledges David's recognized authority and kingship, even before he was king over all Israel. The use of "king" here is significant, as it reflects the transition of power from the house of Saul to David. In Hebrew, "king" is "melech," which denotes not just a political leader but one who is supposed to rule under God's authority and guidance.

Here is the head of Ish-bosheth son of Saul
The identification of Ish-bosheth as "son of Saul" serves to remind the reader of the dynastic struggle between Saul's house and David. Saul, the first king of Israel, was anointed by God but later rejected due to his disobedience. This phrase emphasizes the end of Saul's lineage's claim to the throne, fulfilling God's promise to David.

your enemy who sought your life
This phrase recalls the long-standing enmity between Saul's house and David. Saul's relentless pursuit of David is well-documented in the preceding chapters, where Saul viewed David as a threat to his throne. The Hebrew word for "enemy" is "oyev," which conveys hostility and opposition. This enmity was not just personal but also spiritual, as it represented opposition to God's chosen king.

Today the LORD has granted vengeance
The phrase "the LORD has granted vengeance" reflects a theological interpretation of events. In Hebrew, "vengeance" is "naqam," which implies divine retribution or justice. The speakers attribute the outcome to God's providence, suggesting that David's rise to power is part of God's divine plan. This reflects a common biblical theme where God is seen as the ultimate judge who rights wrongs and establishes justice.

to my lord the king against Saul and his offspring
The use of "my lord the king" shows deference and recognition of David's authority. The phrase "against Saul and his offspring" signifies the complete transfer of power from Saul's lineage to David. It also highlights the fulfillment of God's promise to David, as Saul's house is no longer a threat to his God-ordained kingship. This transition is seen as divinely orchestrated, reinforcing the belief in God's sovereign control over the affairs of men.

The Execution of Rechab and Baanah

But David answered
This phrase introduces David's response, highlighting his role as a decisive and righteous leader. In the Hebrew context, "David" (דָּוִד) means "beloved," reflecting his status as a man after God's own heart. His response is not just a reaction but a reflection of his character and commitment to justice and righteousness, setting a standard for leadership that is both compassionate and firm.

Rechab and his brother Baanah
These individuals are identified as the sons of Rimmon the Beerothite. Their mention here is significant as it sets the stage for the moral and ethical dilemma they present to David. Historically, Rechab and Baanah were captains in Ish-bosheth's army, and their actions in killing Ish-bosheth were intended to curry favor with David. However, David's response underscores the importance of integrity over opportunism.

the sons of Rimmon the Beerothite
This phrase provides a genealogical and geographical context. Beeroth was one of the Gibeonite cities, and its mention here ties the narrative to the broader history of Israel's interactions with the Gibeonites. The Gibeonites were under Israel's protection due to a covenant made during Joshua's time, which adds a layer of complexity to the actions of Rechab and Baanah, who were betraying not just a king but a covenantal relationship.

As surely as the LORD lives
This oath formula is a solemn declaration of truth and intent. The Hebrew word for "LORD" (יְהוָה) is the sacred name of God, emphasizing His eternal and unchanging nature. David's invocation of the LORD's name underscores his deep reverence for God and his reliance on divine justice rather than human schemes. It reflects a worldview where God's sovereignty is the ultimate reality.

who has redeemed my life from all distress
The word "redeemed" (גָּאַל) in Hebrew carries the connotation of a kinsman-redeemer, one who rescues or delivers. David acknowledges God's active role in his life, attributing his survival and success to divine intervention. This phrase is a testament to David's faith and gratitude, recognizing that his life and kingship are sustained by God's grace. It serves as an inspiration for believers to trust in God's providence and deliverance in times of trouble.

when someone told me
This phrase introduces a personal testimony from David, reflecting on a past event. The Hebrew root for "told" is "נָגַד" (nagad), which means to declare or announce. In the ancient Near Eastern context, messengers played a crucial role in communication, often bearing news of significant events. David's recollection here emphasizes the importance of the message and the weight of the responsibility carried by the messenger.

‘Look, Saul is dead,’
The announcement of Saul's death is pivotal. Saul, the first king of Israel, was a complex figure whose reign was marked by both triumph and tragedy. The Hebrew word for "dead" is "מֵת" (met), signifying the end of Saul's tumultuous rule. This moment is significant in Israel's history, as it marks the transition of power and the fulfillment of God's promise to David. The phrase captures the gravity of the moment and the shift in Israel's leadership.

and thought he was bringing me good news
The bearer of the news believed he was delivering a message of victory. The Hebrew word for "good news" is "בְּשׂוֹרָה" (besorah), often associated with joyful tidings. However, David's reaction reveals a deeper understanding of God's sovereignty and justice. In the ancient world, the death of a king could be seen as an opportunity for advancement, but David's response underscores his respect for God's anointed and his commitment to righteousness.

I seized him and put him to death
David's decisive action reflects his adherence to divine justice. The Hebrew verb "תָּפַשׂ" (taphas) means to seize or capture, indicating David's authority and resolve. By executing the messenger, David demonstrates his unwavering commitment to God's principles, rejecting any form of opportunism or treachery. This act serves as a testament to David's integrity and his understanding of the sanctity of God's anointed.

in Ziklag
Ziklag was a Philistine city given to David by Achish, king of Gath, during his time of refuge from Saul. It became a base for David and his men. The mention of Ziklag situates the event geographically and historically, highlighting David's complex relationship with the Philistines and his strategic acumen. This location serves as a backdrop for David's moral and ethical decisions, emphasizing his role as a leader even in exile.

to reward him for his news
The irony in David's statement is profound. The Hebrew word for "reward" is "שָׂכָר" (sachar), typically associated with compensation or wages. However, David's "reward" is death, illustrating the gravity of the messenger's misjudgment. This phrase underscores the biblical principle that actions have consequences and that true justice aligns with God's will. David's response serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of aligning one's actions with divine righteousness.

How much more
This phrase introduces a rhetorical question that emphasizes the gravity of the situation. In Hebrew, the expression often serves to heighten the seriousness of an action or consequence. It suggests that if lesser offenses are punishable, then certainly greater offenses warrant even more severe judgment. This reflects a principle of justice that is deeply rooted in the biblical narrative, where God’s standards are absolute and unwavering.

when wicked men
The term "wicked" in Hebrew is "רָשָׁע" (rasha), which denotes those who are morally wrong or guilty. The Bible consistently portrays wickedness as a deviation from God’s law and character. In this context, the "wicked men" are those who have acted contrary to God’s justice and righteousness, highlighting the moral corruption that David, as a king after God’s own heart, is called to oppose.

have killed
The act of killing, "הָרַג" (harag) in Hebrew, is a direct violation of the commandment "You shall not murder" (Exodus 20:13). This word underscores the premeditated and violent nature of the act. In biblical law, murder is a capital offense, reflecting the sanctity of life as created in the image of God (Genesis 9:6).

an innocent man
The Hebrew word for "innocent" is "צַדִּיק" (tzaddik), meaning righteous or just. This term is used to describe someone who is blameless or without guilt in a particular matter. The innocence of the victim amplifies the atrocity of the crime, as it is not only a legal injustice but a moral outrage against God’s order.

in his own house on his own bed
This phrase paints a vivid picture of betrayal and violation of personal sanctuary. The home, and particularly one’s bed, is a place of safety and rest. The violation of this space by murder is an egregious breach of trust and hospitality, which were highly valued in ancient Near Eastern culture. It underscores the heinousness of the crime and the depth of the offenders' depravity.

should I not now demand his blood from your hand
The phrase "demand his blood" refers to the biblical principle of justice and retribution, often expressed as "life for life" (Exodus 21:23). The "hand" symbolizes responsibility and agency. In this context, David is asserting his role as the executor of divine justice, holding the perpetrators accountable for their actions.

and remove you from the earth
The concept of removal, "בָּעַר" (ba'ar) in Hebrew, often implies purging or cleansing. This reflects the biblical theme of removing evil from the community to maintain holiness and righteousness. The earth, "אֶרֶץ" (eretz), signifies the land given by God, which must be kept pure from defilement. David’s declaration is not only a personal vendetta but a fulfillment of his kingly duty to uphold God’s justice and maintain the sanctity of the land.

So David commanded his young men
The phrase highlights David's authority and leadership. In the Hebrew context, the word for "commanded" (צִוָּה, tzivah) implies a direct order, reflecting David's decisive action in response to the murder of Ish-bosheth. David's "young men" (נְעָרִים, ne'arim) were likely his loyal followers or soldiers, emphasizing the trust and obedience within his ranks. This action underscores David's commitment to justice and the rule of law, even against those who might have thought they were doing him a favor.

and they killed them
This phrase indicates the execution of Rechab and Baanah, the murderers of Ish-bosheth. The Hebrew verb used here (וַיַּכּוּם, vayakkum) is often associated with striking down or smiting, suggesting a swift and decisive act. David's decision to have them killed reflects the biblical principle of justice, where murder is met with capital punishment, aligning with the law given in Genesis 9:6, "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed."

cut off their hands and feet
The cutting off of hands and feet was a severe punishment meant to disgrace and serve as a public deterrent. In ancient Near Eastern cultures, such mutilation was a common practice for traitors or criminals, symbolizing the removal of their ability to act (hands) and flee (feet). This act by David's men was not only punitive but also symbolic, demonstrating the seriousness of their crime against God's anointed.

and hung their bodies by the pool in Hebron
Hanging the bodies publicly was a further act of disgrace and a warning to others. Hebron, being a significant city in Judah and David's capital at the time, was a strategic location for this display. The pool in Hebron would have been a central and visible place, ensuring that the message of justice was widely seen and understood. This act also aligns with Deuteronomy 21:22-23, where the display of executed criminals served as a deterrent to evil.

But they took the head of Ish-bosheth
The respectful treatment of Ish-bosheth's head contrasts with the punishment of his murderers. Despite Ish-bosheth being a rival king, David's actions show respect for the dignity of the deceased and the office he held. This reflects David's consistent respect for Saul's house, as seen throughout 1 and 2 Samuel, and his understanding of God's sovereignty in appointing leaders.

and buried it in Abner’s tomb in Hebron
The burial of Ish-bosheth's head in Abner's tomb is significant. Abner, Saul's cousin and commander, had been a key figure in supporting Ish-bosheth's reign. By placing Ish-bosheth's head in Abner's tomb, David honors both men, acknowledging their roles and the tragic end of Saul's dynasty. This act of burial in Hebron, a city of refuge and a place of ancestral significance, underscores themes of reconciliation and respect for the dead, even amidst political turmoil.

This is a draft of the Berean Study Bible. Please send all comments and recommendations to bereanstudybible@aol.com.



Bible Hub


2 Samuel 3
Top of Page
Top of Page