Genesis 36:7
For their possessions were too great for them to dwell together; the land where they stayed could not support them because of their livestock.
For their possessions were too great for them to dwell together
This phrase highlights the abundance of wealth and resources that Esau and Jacob had accumulated. The Hebrew word for "possessions" is "רְכוּשׁ" (rekhush), which implies not just material wealth but also the blessings and favor of God. In the ancient Near Eastern context, wealth was often measured by livestock, land, and servants, indicating God's provision and blessing. The phrase "too great" underscores the magnitude of their wealth, suggesting that God's blessings were so abundant that they exceeded the capacity of the land. This abundance reflects the fulfillment of God's promises to Abraham, Isaac, and their descendants, emphasizing the faithfulness of God in providing for His people.

the land where they stayed could not support them
The "land" refers to the region of Canaan, a land promised by God to Abraham and his descendants. The Hebrew word for "land" is "אֶרֶץ" (erets), which can mean earth, land, or territory. This specific land was significant in the biblical narrative as it was the land of promise, a symbol of God's covenant with His people. The inability of the land to "support" them due to their vast possessions and livestock indicates the physical limitations of the land, despite its richness. This situation necessitated a separation between Esau and Jacob, which was part of God's divine plan to establish the nation of Israel through Jacob.

because of their livestock
The term "livestock" in Hebrew is "מִקְנֶה" (miqneh), which includes cattle, sheep, goats, and other domesticated animals. Livestock was a primary measure of wealth and prosperity in the ancient world, essential for sustenance, trade, and offerings to God. The abundance of livestock signifies not only material wealth but also the fulfillment of God's promise to multiply Abraham's descendants and bless them. The need for separation due to the livestock's requirements for grazing and water resources illustrates the practical challenges of managing God's blessings and the importance of stewardship. This phrase also foreshadows the future growth and expansion of Jacob's lineage, leading to the formation of the twelve tribes of Israel.

Persons / Places / Events
1. Esau
The brother of Jacob, also known as Edom. He is the ancestor of the Edomites.

2. Jacob
The brother of Esau, later named Israel, and the father of the twelve tribes of Israel.

3. Canaan
The land where Jacob and Esau initially dwelt together before separating due to their large possessions.

4. Livestock
The wealth and possessions of both Esau and Jacob, which were significant enough to cause the need for separation.

5. Separation
The event where Esau and Jacob parted ways due to the inability of the land to support both of their households and livestock.
Teaching Points
Stewardship and Contentment
The account of Esau and Jacob reminds us of the importance of managing our resources wisely and being content with what God has provided. When blessings become burdens, it may be time to reassess our priorities.

Peaceful Separation
Sometimes, separation is necessary to maintain peace and harmony. Esau and Jacob's decision to part ways was a practical solution to avoid conflict, teaching us the value of making difficult decisions for the greater good.

God's Sovereignty in Provision
Despite the separation, God continued to provide for both Esau and Jacob. This demonstrates that God's provision is not limited by our circumstances or locations.

Consequences of Choices
Esau's choice to live separately from Jacob had long-term implications for his descendants. Our decisions today can have lasting effects on future generations.

Unity in Diversity
While Esau and Jacob went their separate ways, they remained brothers. This teaches us that unity does not always mean uniformity, and we can maintain relationships despite differences.
Bible Study Questions
1. How does the separation of Esau and Jacob reflect the principle of stewardship in our own lives?

2. In what ways can we apply the concept of peaceful separation in our personal relationships or community interactions?

3. How does the account of Esau and Jacob illustrate God's sovereignty and provision in times of change or transition?

4. What are some modern-day examples of how our choices can impact future generations, similar to Esau's decision?

5. How can we maintain unity and respect in relationships where there are significant differences, as seen in the relationship between Esau and Jacob?
Connections to Other Scriptures
Genesis 13:6
This verse describes a similar situation between Abram and Lot, where their possessions were too great for them to dwell together, leading to a separation.

Genesis 25:23
This verse foretells the separation and distinction between the descendants of Jacob and Esau, indicating that they would become two nations.

Hebrews 12:16
This verse warns against being like Esau, who is described as profane for selling his birthright, highlighting the spiritual implications of his choices.

Obadiah 1:10-14
This passage speaks of the judgment against Edom (descendants of Esau) for their actions against Israel, showing the long-term consequences of the separation and enmity.
Riches Cannot Secure HappinessGenesis 36:7
Increase of Esau's HouseM. M. Kalisch, Ph. D.Genesis 36:1-43
LessonsG. Hughes, B. D.Genesis 36:1-43
LessonsG. Hughes, B. D.Genesis 36:1-43
LessonsG. Hughes, B. D.Genesis 36:1-43
The History of the Generations of EsauT. H. LealeGenesis 36:1-43
People
Achan, Achbor, Adah, Aholibamah, Aiah, Ajah, Akan, Alvah, Alvan, Amalek, Anah, Aran, Baalhanan, Bashemath, Basmath, Bedad, Bela, Beor, Bilhan, Canaanites, Cheran, Dishan, Dishon, Edomites, Elah, Eliphaz, Elon, Esau, Eshban, Ezer, Gatam, Hadad, Hadar, Hanan, Hemam, Heman, Hemdan, Hivite, Homam, Hori, Horites, Husham, Iram, Ishmael, Israelites, Ithran, Jaalam, Jacob, Jetheth, Jeush, Jobab, Kenaz, Korah, Lotan, Magdiel, Manahath, Matred, Mehetabel, Mezahab, Mibzar, Midianites, Mizzah, Nahath, Nebaioth, Nebajoth, Omar, Onam, Pinon, Reuel, Samlah, Saul, Seir, Shammah, Shaul, Shepho, Shobal, Teman, Temanites, Timna, Timnah, Zaavan, Zepho, Zerah, Zibeon
Places
Avith, Bozrah, Canaan, Dinhabah, Edom, Euphrates River, Hebron, Masrekah, Midian, Moab, Pau, Rehoboth, Seir
Topics
Able, Abundant, Bear, Cattle, Couldn't, Dwell, Livestock, Possessions, Property, Riches, Sojourned, Sojourners, Sojournings, Staying, Strangers, Substance, Support, Sustain, Travels, Wealth, Wherein, Wide
Dictionary of Bible Themes
Genesis 36:7

     4035   abundance
     5476   property

Library
Syria at the Beginning of the Egyptian Conquest
SYRIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE EGYPTIAN CONQUEST NINEVEH AND THE FIRST COSSAEAN KINGS-THE PEOPLES OF SYRIA, THEIR TOWNS, THEIR CIVILIZATION, THEIR RELIGION-PHOENICIA. The dynasty of Uruazagga-The Cossseans: their country, their gods, their conquest of Chaldaea-The first sovereigns of Assyria, and the first Cossaean Icings: Agumhakrime. The Egyptian names for Syria: Khara, Zahi, Lotanu, Kefatiu-The military highway from the Nile to the Euphrates: first section from Zalu to Gaza-The Canaanites:
G. Maspero—History Of Egypt, Chaldaea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, V 4

Genesis
The Old Testament opens very impressively. In measured and dignified language it introduces the story of Israel's origin and settlement upon the land of Canaan (Gen.--Josh.) by the story of creation, i.-ii. 4a, and thus suggests, at the very beginning, the far-reaching purpose and the world-wide significance of the people and religion of Israel. The narrative has not travelled far till it becomes apparent that its dominant interests are to be religious and moral; for, after a pictorial sketch of
John Edgar McFadyen—Introduction to the Old Testament

Links
Genesis 36:7 NIV
Genesis 36:7 NLT
Genesis 36:7 ESV
Genesis 36:7 NASB
Genesis 36:7 KJV

Genesis 36:7 Commentaries

Bible Hub
Genesis 36:6
Top of Page
Top of Page