They carried him back on horses and buried him in Jerusalem with his fathers in the City of David. They carried him back on horsesThis phrase indicates the mode of transportation used for the deceased king, likely Amaziah of Judah. The use of horses signifies a measure of honor and respect, as horses were valuable and often associated with royalty and military power in ancient Israel. The Hebrew word for "horses" is "סוּסִים" (susim), which underscores the importance of the king's status even in death. Historically, horses were not commonly used for burial processions, suggesting that Amaziah was given a dignified return to his homeland. and buried him
The act of burial is significant in Jewish tradition, reflecting the respect for the deceased and the belief in the sanctity of the body. The Hebrew root "קָבַר" (qabar) means to bury or inter, and it is a practice deeply rooted in the culture and religious beliefs of the Israelites. Burial was a way to honor the dead and ensure they were laid to rest according to the customs of their ancestors. in Jerusalem
Jerusalem, the capital city of Judah, holds profound religious and historical significance. It is the city chosen by God for His temple and the center of Jewish worship. The burial of Amaziah in Jerusalem indicates his royal status and connection to the Davidic line. The city's name in Hebrew, "יְרוּשָׁלַיִם" (Yerushalayim), means "foundation of peace," highlighting its role as a spiritual and political center. with his fathers
This phrase reflects the tradition of being buried in family tombs, a practice that emphasized lineage and continuity. The Hebrew word "אָבוֹת" (avot) refers to ancestors or forefathers, underscoring the importance of family heritage and the connection to one's predecessors. Being buried "with his fathers" signifies Amaziah's rightful place within the lineage of Judah's kings. in the City of David
The City of David refers to the ancient core of Jerusalem, named after King David, who established it as his capital. This designation highlights the historical and dynastic significance of the location. The Hebrew term "עִיר דָּוִד" (Ir David) connects Amaziah to the legacy of David, reinforcing the continuity of the Davidic dynasty. The City of David is not only a physical location but also a symbol of God's covenant with David and his descendants. Persons / Places / Events 1. AmaziahThe king of Judah who reigned after his father Joash. His reign was marked by both faithfulness and failure, leading to his eventual downfall and assassination. 2. JerusalemThe capital city of Judah, significant as the spiritual and political center of the Jewish people. It is where Amaziah was buried, highlighting its importance as a burial place for the kings of Judah. 3. City of DavidA specific area within Jerusalem, often associated with the burial of the Judean kings, emphasizing the continuity of the Davidic line. 4. HorsesThe mode of transport used to carry Amaziah's body back to Jerusalem, indicating the respect and honor given to him despite his failures. 5. Burial with his fathersThis phrase signifies the tradition of burying kings with their ancestors, reflecting the importance of family lineage and heritage in Israelite culture. Teaching Points The Legacy of LeadershipAmaziah's life reminds us that leadership is a sacred trust. Leaders are remembered not only for their successes but also for their failures. We should strive to lead with integrity and faithfulness. The Importance of HeritageBeing buried in the City of David signifies the importance of heritage and legacy. As Christians, we are called to honor our spiritual heritage and pass it on to future generations. Respect in DeathDespite Amaziah's failures, he was given a respectful burial. This teaches us the importance of honoring individuals, recognizing their humanity and the image of God in them, even in death. The Consequences of DisobedienceAmaziah's life serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of turning away from God. We are reminded to remain faithful and obedient to God's commands. The Hope of RestorationEven in the midst of failure, there is hope for restoration. Amaziah's burial in the City of David points to the enduring promise of God's covenant with David, ultimately fulfilled in Christ. Bible Study Questions 1. How does the burial of Amaziah in the City of David reflect the importance of heritage and legacy in our own lives? 2. In what ways can we ensure that our leadership, whether in the home, church, or community, leaves a positive legacy? 3. How does the account of Amaziah's life and death challenge us to remain faithful to God in all circumstances? 4. What can we learn from the respect shown to Amaziah in death, and how can we apply this principle in our interactions with others? 5. How does the promise of God's covenant with David, as seen in the burial of Amaziah, point us to the hope we have in Christ? Connections to Other Scriptures 2 Chronicles 25Provides a parallel account of Amaziah's reign, offering additional details about his life, his military campaigns, and his eventual downfall. 1 Kings 2:10Describes the burial of King David, establishing a precedent for the burial of kings in the City of David, which is continued with Amaziah. Hebrews 9:27While not directly related, this verse speaks to the inevitability of death and judgment, which can be connected to the mortality of kings like Amaziah. People Ahaziah, Amaziah, Amittai, Azariah, David, Edomites, Hepher, Jehoaddan, Jehoahaz, Jehoash, Jehu, Jeroboam, Joahaz, Joash, Jonah, Nebat, Zachariah, ZechariahPlaces Beth-shemesh, Corner Gate, Damascus, Edom, Elath, Ephraim Gate, Gath-hepher, Hamath, Israel, Jerusalem, Joktheel, Lachish, Lebanon, Lebo-hamath, Samaria, Sea of the Arabah, Sela, Syria, Valley of SaltTopics Body, Buried, David, Fathers, Horseback, Horses, Jerusalem, Lift, TownDictionary of Bible Themes 2 Kings 14:20 4657 horse 2 Kings 14:1-22 5366 king Library The Prophet Amos.
GENERAL PRELIMINARY REMARKS. It will not be necessary to extend our preliminary remarks on the prophet Amos, since on the main point--viz., the circumstances under which he appeared as a prophet--the introduction to the prophecies of Hosea may be regarded as having been written for those of Amos also. For, according to the inscription, they belong to the same period at which Hosea's prophetic ministry began, viz., the latter part of the reign of Jeroboam II., and after Uzziah had ascended the …
Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg—Christology of the Old TestamentThe Prophet Jonah.
It has been asserted without any sufficient reason, that Jonah is older than Hosea, Joel, Amos, and Obadiah,--that he is the oldest among the prophets whose written monuments have been preserved to us. The passage in 2 Kings xiv. 25, where it is said, that Jonah, the son of Amittai the prophet, prophesied to Jeroboam the happy success of his arms, and the restoration of the ancient boundaries of Israel, and that this prophecy was confirmed by the event, cannot decide in favour of this assertion, …
Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg—Christology of the Old Testament The Twelve Minor Prophets.
1. By the Jewish arrangement, which places together the twelve minor prophets in a single volume, the chronological order of the prophets as a whole is broken up. The three greater prophets, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, stand in the true order of time. Daniel began to prophesy before Ezekiel, but continued, many years after him. The Jewish arrangement of the twelve minor prophets is in a sense chronological; that is, they put the earlier prophets at the beginning, and the later at the end of the …
E. P. Barrows—Companion to the Bible The Prophet Hosea.
GENERAL PRELIMINARY REMARKS. That the kingdom of Israel was the object of the prophet's ministry is so evident, that upon this point all are, and cannot but be, agreed. But there is a difference of opinion as to whether the prophet was a fellow-countryman of those to whom he preached, or was called by God out of the kingdom of Judah. The latter has been asserted with great confidence by Maurer, among others, in his Observ. in Hos., in the Commentat. Theol. ii. i. p. 293. But the arguments …
Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg—Christology of the Old Testament Tiglath-Pileser iii. And the Organisation of the Assyrian Empire from 745 to 722 B. C.
TIGLATH-PILESER III. AND THE ORGANISATION OF THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE FROM 745 to 722 B.C. FAILURE OF URARTU AND RE-CONQUEST Of SYRIA--EGYPT AGAIN UNITED UNDER ETHIOPIAN AUSPICES--PIONKHI--THE DOWNFALL OF DAMASCUS, OF BABYLON, AND OF ISRAEL. Assyria and its neighbours at the accession of Tiglath-pileser III.: progress of the Aramaeans in the basin of the Middle Tigris--Urartu and its expansion into the north of Syria--Damascus and Israel--Vengeance of Israel on Damascus--Jeroboam II.--Civilisation …
G. Maspero—History Of Egypt, Chaldaea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, V 7 The Girdle of the City. Nehemiah 3
The beginning of the circumference was from 'the sheep-gate.' That, we suppose, was seated on the south part, yet but little removed from that corner, which looks south-east. Within was the pool of Bethesda, famous for healings. Going forward, on the south part, was the tower Meah: and beyond that, "the tower of Hananeel": in the Chaldee paraphrast it is, 'The tower Piccus,' Zechariah 14:10; Piccus, Jeremiah 31:38.--I should suspect that to be, the Hippic tower, were not that placed on the north …
John Lightfoot—From the Talmud and Hebraica The Figurative Language of Scripture.
1. When the psalmist says: "The Lord God is a sun and shield" (Psa. 84:11), he means that God is to all his creatures the source of life and blessedness, and their almighty protector; but this meaning he conveys under the figure of a sun and a shield. When, again, the apostle James says that Moses is read in the synagogues every Sabbath-day (Acts 15:21), he signifies the writings of Moses under the figure of his name. In these examples the figure lies in particular words. But it may be embodied …
E. P. Barrows—Companion to the Bible Kings
The book[1] of Kings is strikingly unlike any modern historical narrative. Its comparative brevity, its curious perspective, and-with some brilliant exceptions--its relative monotony, are obvious to the most cursory perusal, and to understand these things is, in large measure, to understand the book. It covers a period of no less than four centuries. Beginning with the death of David and the accession of Solomon (1 Kings i., ii.) it traverses his reign with considerable fulness (1 Kings iii.-xi.), …
John Edgar McFadyen—Introduction to the Old Testament Links 2 Kings 14:20 NIV2 Kings 14:20 NLT2 Kings 14:20 ESV2 Kings 14:20 NASB2 Kings 14:20 KJV
2 Kings 14:20 Commentaries
Bible Hub |
