2 Kings 24:1
During Jehoiakim's reign, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon invaded. So Jehoiakim became his vassal for three years, until he turned and rebelled against Nebuchadnezzar.
During Jehoiakim’s reign
Jehoiakim, originally named Eliakim, was the son of Josiah and was placed on the throne by Pharaoh Necho of Egypt. His reign marks a period of significant turmoil and transition for Judah. The Hebrew root of Jehoiakim's name means "Yahweh raises up," which is ironic given his eventual downfall and rebellion against God’s will. His reign is characterized by a departure from the reforms of his father, Josiah, and a return to idolatry and injustice, setting the stage for divine judgment.

Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon
Nebuchadnezzar II was one of the most powerful monarchs of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, known for his military conquests and the construction of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon. His invasion of Judah was part of a larger campaign to expand Babylonian influence. Historically, Nebuchadnezzar's campaigns are well-documented, and his interactions with Judah are corroborated by Babylonian chronicles. His name in Akkadian means "Nabu, protect my boundary," reflecting his role as a defender and expander of his empire.

invaded the land
The invasion of Judah by Babylon was a fulfillment of prophetic warnings given by prophets like Jeremiah, who had long cautioned that Judah's unfaithfulness would lead to its downfall. The Hebrew word for "invaded" implies a forceful entry and domination, signifying the beginning of the end for the independent kingdom of Judah. This invasion was not just a political maneuver but a divine judgment against a nation that had turned away from God.

Jehoiakim became his vassal
Becoming a vassal meant that Jehoiakim was subjected to Babylonian authority, paying tribute and acknowledging Nebuchadnezzar's supremacy. This was a common practice in the ancient Near East, where weaker states would submit to stronger empires to avoid destruction. Theologically, this subjugation symbolizes Judah's spiritual decline and loss of autonomy due to its disobedience to God.

for three years
The period of three years is significant in biblical numerology, often symbolizing completeness or a period of testing. Jehoiakim's vassalage was a time of testing for Judah, revealing the nation's unwillingness to fully submit to God's discipline. Historically, this timeframe aligns with Babylon's consolidation of power in the region, during which Jehoiakim's loyalty was tested.

But then he turned and rebelled
Jehoiakim's rebellion against Nebuchadnezzar was both a political and spiritual act of defiance. The Hebrew word for "rebelled" conveys a sense of breaking away or casting off authority. This rebellion was ill-advised and ultimately led to further suffering for Judah. Spiritually, it reflects humanity's tendency to resist divine authority, choosing self-will over submission to God's plan.

against Nebuchadnezzar
Rebelling against Nebuchadnezzar was not just a political miscalculation but a rejection of the discipline God had allowed through Babylonian dominance. This act of defiance highlights the futility of resisting God's ordained instruments of correction. Historically, this rebellion led to a series of events culminating in the Babylonian exile, a pivotal moment in Jewish history that reshaped the nation's identity and relationship with God.

Persons / Places / Events
1. Jehoiakim
The king of Judah during this period, known for his disobedience to God and his eventual rebellion against Babylon.

2. Nebuchadnezzar
The king of Babylon, a powerful ruler who expanded his empire and exerted control over Judah.

3. Babylon
The empire that rose to power under Nebuchadnezzar, known for its significant role in the history of Israel and Judah.

4. Vassalage
The state of being a vassal, which in this context means Jehoiakim was subject to Nebuchadnezzar's authority for a period.

5. Rebellion
Jehoiakim's decision to rebel against Nebuchadnezzar, which had significant consequences for Judah.
Teaching Points
The Consequences of Disobedience
Jehoiakim's rebellion against Nebuchadnezzar, despite being warned by prophets like Jeremiah, illustrates the severe consequences of disobedience to God's commands.

God's Sovereignty in World Events
The rise of Nebuchadnezzar and Babylon demonstrates God's control over nations and history, using even pagan rulers to fulfill His purposes.

The Importance of Heeding Prophetic Warnings
The events in 2 Kings 24:1 remind us of the importance of listening to God's messengers and the dangers of ignoring divine warnings.

The Cost of Rebellion
Jehoiakim's rebellion serves as a cautionary tale about the cost of defying authority, especially when it is part of God's ordained plan.

Trusting God's Plan Amidst Political Turmoil
In times of political upheaval, believers are encouraged to trust in God's ultimate plan and remain faithful to His word.
Bible Study Questions
1. What can we learn from Jehoiakim's decision to become a vassal and later rebel against Nebuchadnezzar, and how does this apply to our own lives when dealing with authority?

2. How does the rise of Babylon as described in 2 Kings 24:1 reflect God's sovereignty, and what other biblical examples illustrate this theme?

3. In what ways does the prophetic warning in Jeremiah 25 relate to the events of 2 Kings 24:1, and how can we apply the principle of heeding warnings in our spiritual journey?

4. How does Jehoiakim's account in 2 Kings 24:1 serve as a warning about the consequences of disobedience, and what steps can we take to ensure we remain obedient to God's will?

5. Considering the political and spiritual climate of Jehoiakim's time, how can Christians today navigate political challenges while maintaining their faith and trust in God's plan?
Connections to Other Scriptures
Jeremiah 25
This chapter provides a prophetic context for the events in 2 Kings 24:1, where Jeremiah warns of Babylon's rise and the coming judgment on Judah.

Daniel 1
Describes the beginning of the Babylonian captivity, which is a direct result of the events initiated in 2 Kings 24:1.

2 Chronicles 36
Offers a parallel account of Jehoiakim's reign and his interactions with Nebuchadnezzar, providing additional historical context.

Isaiah 39
Foretells the Babylonian captivity, highlighting the long-term consequences of Judah's disobedience.

Habakkuk 1
Discusses the rise of the Babylonians as an instrument of God's judgment, aligning with the events of 2 Kings 24:1.
Wickedness, Retribution, and Divine ControlD. Thomas 2 Kings 24:1-25:17
The Advent of NebuchadnezzarJ. Orr 2 Kings 24:1-9
WickednessDavid Thomas, D. D.2 Kings 24:1-16
People
Elnathan, Hamutal, Jehoiachin, Jehoiakim, Jeremiah, Manasseh, Mattaniah, Moabites, Nebuchadnezzar, Nehushta, Solomon, Syrians, Zedekiah
Places
Babylon, Brook of Egypt, Egypt, Euphrates River, Jerusalem, Libnah
Topics
Arms, Babylon, Changed, Invaded, Jehoiakim, Jehoi'akim, Jehoiakim's, Mind, Nebuchadnezzar, Nebuchadnez'zar, Rebelled, Rebelleth, Reign, Servant, Turneth, Vassal
Dictionary of Bible Themes
2 Kings 24:1

     5208   armies
     5214   attack
     5366   king
     6224   rebellion, against authority
     8343   servanthood, in society
     8410   decision-making, examples

2 Kings 24:1-2

     8728   enemies, of Israel and Judah

2 Kings 24:1-4

     4215   Babylon
     8278   innocence, teaching on

Library
The Iranian Conquest
Drawn by Boudier, from the engraving in Coste and Flandin. The vignette, drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a statuette in terra-cotta, found in Southern Russia, represents a young Scythian. The Iranian religions--Cyrus in Lydia and at Babylon: Cambyses in Egypt --Darius and the organisation of the empire. The Median empire is the least known of all those which held sway for a time over the destinies of a portion of Western Asia. The reason of this is not to be ascribed to the shortness of its duration:
G. Maspero—History Of Egypt, Chaldaea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, V 9

Extracts No. vi.
[Here twelve pages or more of the objector's manuscript are omitted, as the nature of his arguments will pretty fully appear in the reply; and as he has been obliged to rescind the ground he had taken, it is not expedient to publish his remarks. That the reader may see a little of the manner, however, in which he has given up his part of the argument, the following is inserted.] "Speaking however on the evidences of revelation, you have stated some things worthy of serious consideration; which if
Hosea Ballou—A Series of Letters In Defence of Divine Revelation

Tiglath-Pileser iii. And the Organisation of the Assyrian Empire from 745 to 722 B. C.
TIGLATH-PILESER III. AND THE ORGANISATION OF THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE FROM 745 to 722 B.C. FAILURE OF URARTU AND RE-CONQUEST Of SYRIA--EGYPT AGAIN UNITED UNDER ETHIOPIAN AUSPICES--PIONKHI--THE DOWNFALL OF DAMASCUS, OF BABYLON, AND OF ISRAEL. Assyria and its neighbours at the accession of Tiglath-pileser III.: progress of the Aramaeans in the basin of the Middle Tigris--Urartu and its expansion into the north of Syria--Damascus and Israel--Vengeance of Israel on Damascus--Jeroboam II.--Civilisation
G. Maspero—History Of Egypt, Chaldaea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, V 7

Whether Vengeance Should be Taken on those who have Sinned Involuntarily?
Objection 1: It seems that vengeance should be taken on those who have sinned involuntarily. For the will of one man does not follow from the will of another. Yet one man is punished for another, according to Ex. 20:5, "I am . . . God . . . jealous, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, unto the third and fourth generation." Thus for the sin of Cham, his son Chanaan was curse (Gn. 9:25) and for the sin of Giezi, his descendants were struck with leprosy (4 Kings 5). Again the blood
Saint Thomas Aquinas—Summa Theologica

Covenanting a Privilege of Believers.
Whatever attainment is made by any as distinguished from the wicked, or whatever gracious benefit is enjoyed, is a spiritual privilege. Adoption into the family of God is of this character. "He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power (margin, or, the right; or, privilege) to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name."[617] And every co-ordinate benefit is essentially so likewise. The evidence besides, that Covenanting
John Cunningham—The Ordinance of Covenanting

The Greater Prophets.
1. We have already seen (Chap. 15, Nos. 11 and 12) that from Moses to Samuel the appearances of prophets were infrequent; that with Samuel and the prophetical school established by him there began a new era, in which the prophets were recognized as a distinct order of men in the Theocracy; and that the age of written prophecy did not begin till about the reign of Uzziah, some three centuries after Samuel. The Jewish division of the latter prophets--prophets in the more restricted sense of the
E. P. Barrows—Companion to the Bible

Kings
The book[1] of Kings is strikingly unlike any modern historical narrative. Its comparative brevity, its curious perspective, and-with some brilliant exceptions--its relative monotony, are obvious to the most cursory perusal, and to understand these things is, in large measure, to understand the book. It covers a period of no less than four centuries. Beginning with the death of David and the accession of Solomon (1 Kings i., ii.) it traverses his reign with considerable fulness (1 Kings iii.-xi.),
John Edgar McFadyen—Introduction to the Old Testament

Links
2 Kings 24:1 NIV
2 Kings 24:1 NLT
2 Kings 24:1 ESV
2 Kings 24:1 NASB
2 Kings 24:1 KJV

2 Kings 24:1 Commentaries

Bible Hub
2 Kings 23:37
Top of Page
Top of Page