The account of the Pharisees dismissing Nicodemus is found in the Gospel of John, specifically in John 7:45-52. This passage provides insight into the tension between Jesus and the Jewish religious leaders, as well as the internal divisions among the Pharisees themselves.

Context and Background

The Pharisees were a prominent Jewish sect during the Second Temple period, known for their strict adherence to the Law and traditions. They often found themselves in opposition to Jesus, whose teachings and actions challenged their interpretations and authority. Nicodemus, a Pharisee and a member of the Sanhedrin, is introduced earlier in John 3 as a figure who seeks to understand Jesus' teachings, indicating a more open-minded approach compared to his peers.

Scriptural Account

In John 7:45-52, the temple guards, sent by the chief priests and Pharisees to arrest Jesus, return empty-handed, stating, "No one ever spoke like this man!" (John 7:46). This response frustrates the Pharisees, who question the guards' judgment and express disdain for the crowds who believe in Jesus, accusing them of ignorance of the Law.

Nicodemus, who had previously visited Jesus at night (John 3:1-21), attempts to defend Jesus by appealing to the principles of justice, saying, "Does our law convict a man without first hearing from him to determine what he has done?" (John 7:51). His colleagues dismiss his suggestion, retorting, "Are you from Galilee too? Look into it, and you will see that no prophet comes out of Galilee" (John 7:52).

Analysis

This passage highlights several key themes:

1. Division Among the Pharisees: Nicodemus' defense of Jesus suggests that not all Pharisees were uniformly opposed to Him. His willingness to speak up, albeit cautiously, indicates a division within the ranks of the Pharisees regarding how to handle Jesus.

2. Prejudice and Misunderstanding: The Pharisees' dismissal of Nicodemus' argument reveals their prejudice and misunderstanding. Their rhetorical question about Galilee reflects a common bias against the region and a failure to recognize the fulfillment of prophecy in Jesus' ministry.

3. Legal and Moral Principles: Nicodemus' appeal to the law underscores the importance of justice and due process, principles that were being overshadowed by the Pharisees' hostility towards Jesus. His intervention serves as a reminder of the ethical standards that should guide religious and legal proceedings.

4. Courage and Risk: Nicodemus' actions demonstrate a measure of courage, as he risks his reputation and standing among the Pharisees by speaking in defense of Jesus. This act foreshadows his later involvement in Jesus' burial (John 19:39), suggesting a growing faith and commitment.

Conclusion

The episode of the Pharisees dismissing Nicodemus is a significant moment in the Gospel narrative, illustrating the complex dynamics at play among the Jewish leaders and their interactions with Jesus. It serves as a testament to the challenges faced by those who sought to understand and follow Jesus amidst opposition and misunderstanding.