2 Kings 5:25
When Gehazi went in and stood before his master, Elisha asked him, "Gehazi, where have you been?" "Your servant did not go anywhere," he replied.
When he went in and stood before his master
This phrase sets the scene for a confrontation between Gehazi and Elisha. The act of "going in" and "standing before" signifies a formal approach, indicating respect and submission to authority. In the Hebrew context, standing before a master or prophet like Elisha was a position of accountability. Gehazi's physical posture reflects the expectation of truthfulness and transparency, which is a recurring theme in the prophetic narratives of the Old Testament.

Elisha asked him
Elisha, the prophet, serves as God's representative, and his inquiry is not merely a human question but a divine probing into Gehazi's actions. The Hebrew root for "asked" (שָׁאַל, sha'al) often implies a deeper search for truth or understanding. Elisha's role as a prophet is to guide, correct, and sometimes rebuke, reflecting God's desire for holiness and integrity among His people.

'Where have you been, Gehazi?'
This question is direct and personal, highlighting the relational aspect between Elisha and Gehazi. The use of Gehazi's name adds a personal touch, emphasizing accountability. In biblical narratives, questions from God or His prophets often serve to reveal the heart's condition, much like God's question to Adam, "Where are you?" in Genesis 3:9. It is an invitation for confession and repentance.

'Your servant did not go anywhere,'
Gehazi's response is a blatant lie, showcasing a moral and spiritual failing. The phrase "Your servant" is an attempt to maintain a facade of loyalty and submission, yet it is contradicted by his deceit. In the Hebrew culture, a servant's integrity was paramount, and this lie represents a breach of trust. Gehazi's denial is reminiscent of other biblical figures who attempted to hide their sins, such as Cain or Ananias and Sapphira, illustrating the timeless struggle between truth and deception.

he replied
The simplicity of this phrase underscores the gravity of Gehazi's lie. His reply is not just a verbal response but a reflection of his heart's condition. In the biblical narrative, words are powerful and reveal the inner state of a person. Gehazi's reply sets the stage for the consequences that follow, reminding readers of the biblical principle that God desires truth in the inward being (Psalm 51:6).

Persons / Places / Events
1. Elisha
A prophet in Israel, successor to Elijah, known for his miracles and guidance to the kings of Israel.

2. Gehazi
The servant of Elisha, who becomes central in this account due to his deceitful actions.

3. Naaman
Though not directly mentioned in this verse, he is the Syrian commander whose healing from leprosy sets the stage for Gehazi's actions.

4. Israel
The setting of this event, where Elisha's ministry takes place.

5. The Event
Gehazi's deceitful pursuit of Naaman to obtain gifts under false pretenses, leading to this confrontation with Elisha.
Teaching Points
The Consequences of Deceit
Gehazi's lie to Elisha serves as a warning about the spiritual and practical consequences of deceit. Lying not only damages relationships but also separates us from God's truth.

Integrity in Service
As Elisha's servant, Gehazi was in a position of trust. His failure reminds us of the importance of integrity, especially when serving others or in positions of responsibility.

The All-Seeing God
Elisha's knowledge of Gehazi's actions, despite not being physically present, illustrates God's omniscience. We are reminded that nothing is hidden from God, and we should live transparently before Him.

The Temptation of Materialism
Gehazi's desire for Naaman's gifts highlights the danger of materialism. We must guard our hearts against the love of money and possessions, which can lead us away from God's will.

Repentance and Restoration
While Gehazi's account ends with judgment, it serves as a call to repentance. When we fall, we must turn back to God, seeking His forgiveness and restoration.
Bible Study Questions
1. How does Gehazi's response to Elisha reflect the nature of sin and its impact on our relationship with God and others?

2. In what ways can we ensure that we maintain integrity in our daily lives, especially in positions of trust or service?

3. How does the account of Gehazi challenge us to examine our own attitudes towards material possessions and wealth?

4. What can we learn from Elisha's response to Gehazi about addressing sin and holding others accountable in a loving and truthful manner?

5. How do the themes of this passage connect with the broader biblical account of sin, repentance, and redemption?
Connections to Other Scriptures
Genesis 3
The deceit of Gehazi can be compared to the deceit of the serpent in the Garden of Eden, highlighting the theme of temptation and sin.

Acts 5
The account of Ananias and Sapphira, who also lied about material possessions, parallels Gehazi's deceit and the consequences of lying to God's representatives.

Proverbs 12:22
This verse speaks about the Lord detesting lying lips, which directly relates to Gehazi's lie to Elisha.

Luke 16:10
The principle of being faithful in little things is relevant to Gehazi's failure in his role as a servant.

James 1:14-15
This passage describes the process of temptation leading to sin, which is evident in Gehazi's actions.
A Lie Sticks2 Kings 5:25
Continuity of Evil InfluencesT. De Witt Talmage.2 Kings 5:25
Heredity May Transmit Predisposition to DiseaseNewman, "Bacteria."2 Kings 5:25
Heredity not Wholly a DisadvantageCombe on the "Constitution of Man. "2 Kings 5:25
History of Naaman's Disease and CureD. Thomas 2 Kings 5:1-27
A Voice of WarningJ. R. Macduff, D. D.2 Kings 5:20-27
Avarice a Fatal ViceSpurgeon, Charles Haddon2 Kings 5:20-27
Deception Detected and PunishedHomiletic Magazine2 Kings 5:20-27
Defilement of God's Work by Covetous MenG. B. Ryley.2 Kings 5:20-27
Elision and GehaziC.H. Irwin 2 Kings 5:20-27
GehaziJ. Parker, D. D.2 Kings 5:20-27
GehaziT. Jackson.2 Kings 5:20-27
GehaziW. Jay.2 Kings 5:20-27
GehaziHomilist2 Kings 5:20-27
One Man's Blessing Another Man's CurseG. B. Ryley.2 Kings 5:20-27
The Covetousness of GehaziT. J. Finlayson.2 Kings 5:20-27
The Story of Naaman: 3. Gehazi's FalsehoodJ. Orr 2 Kings 5:20-27
When Disguises are RemovedH. O. Mackey.2 Kings 5:20-27
People
Aram, Elisha, Gehazi, Naaman, Syrians
Places
Abana River, Damascus, Jordan River, Pharpar, Samaria, Syria
Topics
Anywhere, Comest, Didn't, Elisha, Eli'sha, Entered, Gehazi, Geha'zi, Hither, Master, Nowhere, Servant, Stand, Stood, Thither, Whence, Whither
Dictionary of Bible Themes
2 Kings 5:19-27

     5413   money, attitudes

2 Kings 5:22-27

     8776   lies

Library
Naaman's Wrath
'And Elisha sent a messenger unto Naaman, saying, Go and wash in Jordan seven times, and thy flesh shall come again to thee, and thou shalt be clean. 11. But Naaman was wroth, and went away.'--2 KINGS v. 10,11. These two figures are significant of much beyond themselves. Elisha the prophet is the bearer of a divine cure. Naaman, the great Syrian noble, is stricken with the disease that throughout the Old Testament is treated as a parable of sin and death. He was the commander-in-chief of the army
Alexander Maclaren—Expositions of Holy Scripture

Naaman's Imperfect Faith
'And he returned to the man of God, he and all his company, and came and stood before him: and he said, Behold, now I know that there is no God in all the earth, but in Israel: now therefore, I pray thee, take a blessing of thy servant. 16. But he said, As the Lord liveth, before whom I stand, I will receive none. And he urged him to take it; but he refused. 17. And Naaman said, Shall there not then, I pray thee, be given to thy servant two mules' burden of earth? for thy servant will henceforth
Alexander Maclaren—Expositions of Holy Scripture

Mr. Evil-Questioning Tried and Executed
Just listen to what Evil Questioning said to Naaman, and what Naaman said as the result of it. If I understand my text aright, it means just this: "What virtue can there be in water? Why should I be told to go and wash at all? I have washed many times and it never cured my leprosy. This dry disease is not so readily got rid of; but supposing there is some medical influence in water, why must I wash in Jordan? It is but a mere ditch, why can I not go and wash in some of my own rivers? We have medicinal
Charles Haddon Spurgeon—Spurgeon's Sermons Volume 6: 1860

A Little Maid
BY THEODORE T. MUNGER [From "Lamps and Paths," by courtesy of Houghton, Mifflin & Co.] In old days we read of angels who came and took men by the hand, and led them away from the city of Destruction. We see no white-robed angels now; yet men are led away from threatening destruction: a hand is put into theirs, and they are gently guided toward a bright and calm land, so that they look no more backward; and the hand may be that of a little child.--GEORGE ELIOT As aromatic plants bestow No spicy fragrance
Philip P. Wells—Bible Stories and Religious Classics

Gehazi
BY REV. J. MORGAN GIBBON "The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy seed for ever. And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow."--2 KINGS v. 27. Elisha and Gehazi were master and man. They were more. They were almost father and son. Elisha calls him "my heart," just as Paul calls Onesimus his heart. Yet they parted so.--"He went out from his presence a leper." The punishment was terrible. Was it deserved? Had the master a right to pass this sentence?
George Milligan—Men of the Bible; Some Lesser-Known

Whether Christ's Genealogy is Suitably Traced by the Evangelists?
Objection 1: It would seem that Christ's genealogy is not suitably traced by the Evangelists. For it is written (Is. 53:8): "Who shall declare His generation?" Therefore Christ's genealogy should not have been set down. Objection 2: Further, one man cannot possibly have two fathers. But Matthew says that "Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary": whereas Luke says that Joseph was the son of Heli. Therefore they contradict one another. Objection 3: Further, there seem to be divergencies between them
Saint Thomas Aquinas—Summa Theologica

Whether Christ was Baptized at a Fitting Time?
Objection 1: It would seem that Christ was baptized at an unfitting time. For Christ was baptized in order that He might lead others to baptism by His example. But it is commendable that the faithful of Christ should be baptized, not merely before their thirtieth year, but even in infancy. Therefore it seems that Christ should not have been baptized at the age of thirty. Objection 2: Further, we do not read that Christ taught or worked miracles before being baptized. But it would have been more profitable
Saint Thomas Aquinas—Summa Theologica

"Let any Man Come. "
[7] "In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto Me, and drink. He that believeth on Me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water."--John 7:37-38. THE text which heads this paper contains one of those mighty sayings of Christ which deserve to be printed in letters of gold. All the stars in heaven are bright and beautiful; yet even a child can see that "one star differeth from another in glory"
John Charles Ryle—The Upper Room: Being a Few Truths for the Times

Kings
The book[1] of Kings is strikingly unlike any modern historical narrative. Its comparative brevity, its curious perspective, and-with some brilliant exceptions--its relative monotony, are obvious to the most cursory perusal, and to understand these things is, in large measure, to understand the book. It covers a period of no less than four centuries. Beginning with the death of David and the accession of Solomon (1 Kings i., ii.) it traverses his reign with considerable fulness (1 Kings iii.-xi.),
John Edgar McFadyen—Introduction to the Old Testament

Links
2 Kings 5:25 NIV
2 Kings 5:25 NLT
2 Kings 5:25 ESV
2 Kings 5:25 NASB
2 Kings 5:25 KJV

2 Kings 5:25 Commentaries

Bible Hub
2 Kings 5:24
Top of Page
Top of Page