---

I. HE "WALKED WITH GOD" — A BRIEF AND SIMPLE STATEMENT OF A MOMENTOUS FACT. Of course the meaning is, that he was a good man, that he lived religiously. True religion is, walking "with God." We are meant to walk with someone. We are social as well as active. Solitary journeying is sorrowful journeying. Company gives safety as well as cheer, beguiles the long hours and goads the flagging spirits. Most men have fellowships in their journey through life — companions of their moral ways, "walking with the wise," or "going with the evil." But the highest of all fellowships is with God: and "if we all walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship one with another." We "walk with God." What does it include? Unquestionably realization. God is with us wherever we are, but we are with Him only as we recognize and feel Him to be present. God is "invisible," and only faith can realize; and "by faith Enoch was translated." In the dark night, a stranger perhaps might place himself by our side, or just behind us, for a time, but we should not walk with him. In the dark night of sin, "God is not far from every one of us," but only one here and there are with Him. To see God, to be aware of His solemn nearness, to act as if this thought were ever in our mind, "Thou, God, seest me," doing His will as that of a present Master, rejoicing in His favour as that of a present Friend, and trusting in His succour as that of a present Protector — to go on thus divinely right, and brave, and happy, is to "walk with God." It includes intercourse. "But truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ."

II. Enoch walked with God, AFTER THE BIRTH OF METHUSELAH. It was then, so far as appears, that he began to do so. It is not said that he did so before. Until then it is said that "he lived," as it is said of the rest. Does it not imply that he had not walked with God for sixty-five years? Or, supposing the expression, in his case, refers to eminence in religion, does it not imply that at that time his religion received a new start?

III. Be this as it may, the fact is clear that Enoch did walk with God after the birth of Methuselah and the births of other children. One of the two men who have had the honours of translation in this world for "pleasing God" was a man who LIVED IN THE MIDST OF SOCIETY, and was surrounded with children; he was not a recluse or a celibate. He lived in that condition in which there are natural and necessary distractions and temptations. It would be saying very little for religion if such a case were impossible. It would be queer theology which taught that man must denude himself of a portion of himself, ignore some of his capabilities and propensities, in order to know and possess much, or most, of God. When it is said that Enoch walked with God, it is meant that he attained to special religious excellence. His religion did not merely come into contact with his secular life; his spiritual humanity did not merely touch his social humanity, but, like the prophet upon the dead child, "stretched itself upon" it, mouth on mouth, eyes on eyes, hands on hands, and made it live. His religion was life, an active life. He "walked with God."

IV. We see Enoch's eminent godliness attaining A STRANGE AND SIGNAL HONOUR. "He was not, for God took him." Paul says of Enoch, he did not "see death." Christ says of every disciple that "he does not taste death." I know not how it strikes you, but I always feel when reading this passage as if there was a beautiful fitness in this exit, a fitness of course and end. God took him who had walked with Him, bore him away to another sphere. The very silence of the historian aids the impression: there is no breach between the earthly and the heavenly life, no defined horizon — clouds, and sky, fields, hills, and wood, meet together, and this world's beauty and the glory of the world above melt into each other, and one unbroken scene fills and satisfies the eye. He was with God here, he is with God there. He became more and more Divine in the lower and harder conditions of life, and now he has reached a state where nothing exists to check or disappoint his Godward aspirations. There is no translation now for the righteous, but there is better, transformation, the being "changed from glory to glory now," and "the bearing of the image of the heavenly" hereafter.

(A. J. Morris.)

---

---

KJV: And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

WEB: Enoch walked with God, and he was not, for God took him.