Parallel Verses New International Version Rephah was his son, Resheph his son, Telah his son, Tahan his son,
English Standard Version Rephah was his son, Resheph his son, Telah his son, Tahan his son,
New American Standard Bible Rephah was his son along with Resheph, Telah his son, Tahan his son,
King James Bible And Rephah was his son, also Resheph, and Telah his son, and Tahan his son,
Holman Christian Standard Bible his son Rephah, his son Resheph, his son Telah, his son Tahan,
International Standard Version Rephah was also his descendant, as were Resheph, Telah, Tahan,
American Standard Version And Rephah was his son, and Resheph, and Telah his son, and Tahan his son,
Douay-Rheims Bible And Rapha was his son, and Reseph, and Thale, of whom was born Thaan,
Darby Bible Translation And his son was Rephah, and Resheph, and Telah his son, and Tahan his son,
Young's Literal Translation and Rephah is his son, and Resheph, and Telah his son, and Tahan his son,
Commentaries 7:1-40 Genealogies. - Here is no account either of Zebulun or Dan. We can assign no reason why they only should be omitted; but it is the disgrace of the tribe of Dan, that idolatry began in that colony which fixed in Laish, and called it Dan, Jud 18 and there one of the golden calves was set up by Jeroboam. Dan is omitted, Re 7. Men become abominable when they forsake the worship of the true God, for any creature object.
21. whom the men of Gath … slew, &c.—This interesting little episode gives us a glimpse of the state of Hebrew society in Egypt; for the occurrence narrated seems to have taken place before the Israelites left that country. The patriarch Ephraim was then alive, though he must have arrived at a very advanced age; and the Hebrew people, at all events those of them who were his descendants, still retained their pastoral character. It was in perfect consistency with the ideas and habits of Oriental shepherds that they should have made a raid on the neighboring tribe of the Philistines for the purpose of plundering their flocks. For nothing is more common among them than hostile incursions on the inhabitants of towns, or on other nomad tribes with whom they have no league of amity. But a different view of the incident is brought out, if, instead of "because," we render the Hebrew particle "when" they came down to take their cattle, for the tenor of the context leads rather to the conclusion that "the men of Gath" were the aggressors, who, making a sudden foray on the Ephraimite flocks, killed the shepherds including several of the sons of Ephraim. The calamity spread a deep gloom around the tent of their aged father, and was the occasion of his receiving visits of condolence from his distant relatives, according to the custom of the East, which is remarkably exemplified in the history of Job (Job 2:11; compare Joh 11:19). |
|